From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun Oct 1 01:41:14 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id BAA18297; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA21249; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:41:11 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id BAA19405; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:40:49 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA172656 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:39:01 -0700 Received: from jim.southcom.com.au (IDENT:root@jim.southcom.com.au [203.31.83.230]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA13542 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:38:58 -0700 Received: from localhost (jim@localhost) by jim.southcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e919d0625932; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:39:01 +1100 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:39:00 +1100 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jim Woodward To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Multiline header bug In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Francisco Arias X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Francisco Arias wrote: > > I'm refering to the "UW c-client library vulnerability" that > appears on september 1st on this list and bugtraq. I have not heard about > a patch for this. I have been looking for a patch also, I heard that its fixed in pine 4.30 which is still in beta test, I wonder when either a patch or pine 4.30 (said to be in beta since July?) will be available. Regards, Jim. - name : Jim Woodward www : http://www.jim.southcom.com.au email : jim@jim.southcom.com.au From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 3 15:15:07 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id PAA31951; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA08592; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:15:03 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA08778; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:14:13 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA166826 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:55:58 -0700 Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA18677 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:55:56 -0700 Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51]) by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 44FC710681 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:55:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:55:07 -0500 Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "John Lange" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Remote explote for Pine. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "pine-info" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN So what is being done about this? I have shut down Pine until I can get more info or a patch but my users are screaming. John Lange Darkcore Network -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 3 16:54:11 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id QAA29036; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA12178; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:54:09 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA14627; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:53:40 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA159440 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:52:47 -0700 Received: from aurora.uaf.edu (fxjwk@aurora.uaf.edu [137.229.18.100]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA26588 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:52:47 -0700 Received: from localhost (fxjwk@localhost) by aurora.uaf.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13721; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:52:44 -0800 (AKDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:52:44 -0800 (AKDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jo Knox To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Remote explote for Pine. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: johnl@clearoption.com X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote: > So what is being done about this? > > I have shut down Pine until I can get more info or a patch but my users are > screaming. If you are referring to OpenBSD Security group putting Pine on their "forbidden" list, their methodology (as described) is flawed... If I read it right, the claim is that since pine uses c functions which can be exploited by buffer overflows, then a hacker could construct and mail a message which would have a super long record with executable payload---that's a huge leap of logic there; one does not necessarily imply the other! That not withstanding, it could be possible. Were that to be exploited, the message's executed payload could end up with the privs of the user who invoked Pine. Seems like the safest course of action is to forward root's mail somewhere else (doesn't everybody?) and treat it like other layered software. Or did I miss something else? Let's all use Outlook Express! (And how many days has DOD been shut down with mail worms?) jo From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 3 17:45:42 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id RAA06886; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA28817; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:45:40 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA17011; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:44:59 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA94104 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:44:17 -0700 Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu (qmailr@isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.211.213]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA20309 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:44:16 -0700 Received: (qmail 62312 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Oct 2000 00:44:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 00:44:16 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:44:13 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Frank Tobin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Remote explote for Pine. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Jo Knox X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: ftobin@palanthas.neverending.org X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jo Knox, at 15:52 -0800 on Tue, 3 Oct 2000, wrote: > If you are referring to OpenBSD Security group putting Pine on their > "forbidden" list, their methodology (as described) is flawed... FreeBSD, not OpenBSD (although maybe them too). > If I read it right, the claim is that since pine uses c functions > which can be exploited by buffer overflows, then a hacker could > construct and mail a message which would have a super long record with > executable payload---that's a huge leap of logic there; one does not > necessarily imply the other! They do not imply each other, but it is cause for very high suspiscion. Either way, it has more to do with the numerous use of these functions, and the history of UofW systems. > That not withstanding, it could be possible. Were that to be > exploited, the message's executed payload could end up with the privs > of the user who invoked Pine. Seems like the safest course of action > is to forward root's mail somewhere else (doesn't everybody?) and > treat it like other layered software. There are two effects that this can bring about. First, a DOS against the Pine user. Second, more serious, a remote attacker could send mail which could get the user to execute an arbitrary command. - -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAjnafWAACgkQVv/RCiYMT6M/KwCgn8RVFd3eZNnRfG8tImRUpq+/ ATgAoJmGhBtsSHDb/XagckTzuHqVHrH3 =TCsb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 3 18:59:03 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:59:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id SAA00929; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA14957; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:59:00 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA18624; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:58:12 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA172552 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:57:15 -0700 Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA28695 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:57:14 -0700 Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51]) by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD20910681; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:57:13 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:56:26 -0500 Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "John Lange" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Remote explote for Pine. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Jo Knox" , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN No, I'm referring to the remote exploit of Pine's mail checking routine that allows a remote user to send mail to a client with a long "FROM" field, crashing Pine and gaining access to the users account: http://www.securityfocus.com/frames/?content=/vdb/bottom.html%3Fvid%3D1709 The scary part is "this can be used for a remote, anonymous attacker to gain local access to the target host." Obviously a huge concern. While no exploit has been found in the wild, I don't want myself or my users to be the first ones to discover one. I'm wondering if a patch is in the works and how long its expected to take or do I have to go to the trouble to install a new local mail client instead? My users obviously can't live without their mail for very long. The bugtraq advisory was already posted to this list (I read it in the archives) but here is the jist of it: --- snip --- A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the popular mail client Pine 4.21 (and possibly earlier versions), relating to the function which regularly checks for incoming email. In standard e-mail message headers is a field that holds the name and address of the sender. It typically looks like and is presented in pine like this: From: username Pine does not check the length of the username value when copying it into a memory buffer of predefined length. As a result, if a large "from" value is sent in the email header, it can corrupt "internal" memory when the offending function is called and the oversized buffer is copied onto the stack. An attacker can overwrite the return address of the function on the stack with a value that points back into the buffer, to which the function would return. Arbitrary machine instructions placed on the stack would then be executed. The real concern here is that this requires no user interaction to exploit.. a target need only be using a vulnerable version of pine. The overflow occurs when the user recieves new email. While typically not yielding root priviliges (unless root reads email with pine AS root) this can be used for a remote, anonymous attacker to gain local access to the target host. --- snip --- John Lange -----Original Message----- From: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu]On Behalf Of Jo Knox Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 6:53 PM To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Remote explote for Pine. On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote: > So what is being done about this? > > I have shut down Pine until I can get more info or a patch but my users are > screaming. If you are referring to OpenBSD Security group putting Pine on their "forbidden" list, their methodology (as described) is flawed... If I read it right, the claim is that since pine uses c functions which can be exploited by buffer overflows, then a hacker could construct and mail a message which would have a super long record with executable payload---that's a huge leap of logic there; one does not necessarily imply the other! That not withstanding, it could be possible. Were that to be exploited, the message's executed payload could end up with the privs of the user who invoked Pine. Seems like the safest course of action is to forward root's mail somewhere else (doesn't everybody?) and treat it like other layered software. Or did I miss something else? Let's all use Outlook Express! (And how many days has DOD been shut down with mail worms?) jo From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 3 23:46:05 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id XAA28912; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA05234; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:45:58 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id XAA26945; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:45:33 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA216668 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:37 -0700 Received: from fester.comp-u-port.net (IDENT:root@fester.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.61]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA26999 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:35 -0700 Received: from pugsley.comp-u-port.net (pugsley.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.34]) by fester.comp-u-port.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA14411 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 02:44:29 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 02:44:28 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: pine-info To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: dld@mail.comp-u-port.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN DISCLAIMER: Just joined, but searched the archives and did not find this mentioned. If it has been discussed, please point me to the thread. Thanx. Can anyone confirm that in PC-Pine v4.21 (on WinNT) the fully qualified path for attachments must be less than or equal to 79 characters? I am not able to attach a file if the fully qualified path is 80 or more characters. i.e. x:\123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012.ext x:\directory1\directory2\directory3\directory4\directory5\directory6\file12.ext both attach fine, but x:\1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123.ext x:\directory1\directory2\directory3\directory4\directory5\directory6\file123.ext Don't. If others can confirm this, would the developers please extend this to at least 255 is not longer. Thanks. -- Derek Diget -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Mon Oct 9 07:24:33 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA25585; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA22888; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:24:31 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA12299; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:23:48 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA22724 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:22:03 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA12674 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:22:02 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 15:37:46 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 15:22:19 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 15:21:54 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: date/time stamping in debug files Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there any way of having more date/time stamps in the debug files? ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Mon Oct 9 08:43:56 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA29491; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA25134; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:54 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA12802; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:02 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA124280 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:12 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA10753 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:12 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA346986; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: date/time stamping in debug files In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bridget Nichols X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Bridget Nichols (BNichols@hhnt.org) wrote in the pine-info list about "date/time stamping in debug files" today: :) Is there any way of having more date/time stamps in the debug files? Start Pine with like "pine -d datestamp". See "pine -h" for more options. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 02:15:50 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA04366; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04452; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:15:48 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA05681; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:10:12 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA173032 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:09:18 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA00451 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:09:17 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:25:06 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:10:08 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:09:54 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: command line use of pine Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is is possible to run pine as a single command line execution as follows: pine bnichols@hhnt.org -attach filename .... without going into Compose and selecting ^XY ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 02:25:22 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA24014; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04627; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:25:18 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA05955; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:24:48 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA141446 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:24:07 -0700 Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu (qmailr@isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.211.213]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA30768 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:24:06 -0700 Received: (qmail 41158 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Oct 2000 09:24:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Oct 2000 09:24:06 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 04:24:06 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Frank Tobin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: command line use of pine In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bridget Nichols X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: ftobin@localhost X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Bridget Nichols, at 10:09 +0100 on Tue, 10 Oct 2000, wrote: > Is is possible to run pine as a single command line execution as follows: > > pine bnichols@hhnt.org -attach filename .... > > without going into Compose and selecting ^XY You might just want to bypass Pine altogether and do: mail bnichols@hhnt.org < filename ...assuming, of course, you don't mind "filename" being in-body. -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 02:28:22 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA09267; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04682; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:28:19 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA16870; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:22:52 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA119092 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:22:18 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA30669 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:22:17 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:38:19 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:23:26 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:23:01 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: time delay Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have a 1minute time delay be ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 02:43:21 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA12337; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA05056; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:43:13 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA04098; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:46 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA75032 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA110744; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:04 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: command line use of pine In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bridget Nichols X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Bridget Nichols wrote: > Is is possible to run pine as a single command line execution as follows: > > pine bnichols@hhnt.org -attach filename .... > > without going into Compose and selecting ^XY Yes, but you have to get Eduardo's "Pine sends e-mail from the command line" patch first: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/#commandline -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 05:40:04 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA00655; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA24042; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:40:01 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA07640; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:39:32 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA154992 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:38:51 -0700 Received: from tunku.uady.mx (tunku.uady.mx [148.209.1.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA14651 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:38:49 -0700 Received: from localhost (angel@localhost) by tunku.uady.mx (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9ACgEK11509; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:42:18 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:42:14 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: delete messges problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Frank Tobin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have a question about Pine: Working with pine, before quit of pine I marked to delete some mails, then I quit and delete this messages in pine, but in the next session there are the sames messages marked in the last session...what hapenned in this case? please send me comments about this problem. Thanks in advance ************************************ | Q.B.B.ANGEL G. POLANCO RODRIGUEZ | | UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE YUCATAN | | DIRECCION GENERAL DE | | DESARROLLO ACADEMICO | | DEPARTAMENTO DE TELEINFORMATICA| | CALLE 59 POR AV. ITZAEZ # 490 | | MERIDA, YUCATAN, MEXICO | | CODIGO POSTAL : 97 000 | | TELEFONO:52 (99) 23 74 28 | | E-mail: angel@tunku.uady.mx | ************************************ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 05:54:30 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA24834; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA24297; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:54:28 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA05918; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:48:57 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA154982 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:48:30 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA11880 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:48:28 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:04:28 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:49:31 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:49:29 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: time delay Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have a 1minute time delay between "new mail called" and "SIGCHILD raised"= (under debug level 9) which I cannot account for: 11:18:15.536628 -- gf_pipe: = 11:18:15.536872 done. = = 11:18:15.537295 new mail called (0 2 2)= ? ??? 11:19:16.388939 SIGCHLD raised = 11:19:16.407= 774 cancel_busy_alarm(0) = 11:19:16.408184 = q_status_message(Sending mail DONE) =20 Is this delay likely to be generated by sendmail or pine? ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 09:06:44 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA01584; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA13297; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:06:40 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA14469; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:04:29 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA151998 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:01:15 -0700 Received: from brm.bireme.br (brm.bireme.br [200.6.42.33]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA31107 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:01:08 -0700 Received: from bireme.br ([200.6.42.43]) by brm.bireme.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA17024 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:47:57 -0300 (SAT) Message-Id: <39E34B1D.EC3E33D2@bireme.br> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:00:13 -0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Marcia Ymanaka Barretto To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Problem with speed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it continues browsing the message. Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem? Does anybody know how to fix it? Thank you for any suggestion. Marcia -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 09:27:36 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA21931; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA13973; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:27:34 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA15055; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:26:34 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA75182 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:23:34 -0700 Received: from helix.mgh.harvard.edu (helix.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.108.14]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA14268 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:23:33 -0700 Received: from localhost by helix.mgh.harvard.edu (8.8.8/1.1.20.3/31Dec98-1151AM) id MAA0000005533; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Dennis Gurgul Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dennis Gurgul To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem with speed In-Reply-To: <39E34B1D.EC3E33D2@bireme.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Marcia Ymanaka Barretto X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum , Helix Operator X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We had the same problem on a Digital machine, using Pine 3.95. Rebooting fixed it (for now). Delays weren't as drastic (maybe a minute), but similar behavior. I'd like to know what causes this also. Dennis J. Gurgul Helix Server Management 617.724.3169 On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Marcia Ymanaka Barretto wrote: > We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to > start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even > browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press > the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not > touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it > continues browsing the message. > > Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem? > Does anybody know how to fix it? > > Thank you for any suggestion. > Marcia > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 11:24:47 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA30564; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA01675; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:24:43 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA06875; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:23:34 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA147448 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:21:20 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA230756; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:21:00 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem with speed In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dennis Gurgul , Marcia Ymanaka Barretto X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Although someone might have some ideas as to why this is occurring, we'll probably need some debugging info to help determine the cause of the problem. To help determine the cause of delays like this, run Pine in debug level 9 by using the -d 9 flag (i.e. "pine -d 9"), and then examine the .pine-debug1 file. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Dennis Gurgul wrote: > > We had the same problem on a Digital machine, using Pine 3.95. Rebooting > fixed it (for now). Delays weren't as drastic (maybe a minute), but > similar behavior. I'd like to know what causes this also. > > Dennis J. Gurgul > Helix Server Management > 617.724.3169 > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Marcia Ymanaka Barretto wrote: > > > We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to > > start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even > > browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press > > the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not > > touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it > > continues browsing the message. > > > > Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem? > > Does anybody know how to fix it? > > > > Thank you for any suggestion. > > Marcia > > > > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Tue Oct 10 15:04:31 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA04998; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA09512; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:04:20 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA09157; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:58:46 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA50964 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:45:03 -0700 Received: from brm.bireme.br (brm.bireme.br [200.6.42.33]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA19742; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:44:44 -0700 Received: from bireme.br ([200.6.42.43]) by brm.bireme.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22091; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:31:36 -0300 (SAT) Message-Id: <39E39BAA.E7701A74@bireme.br> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:43:54 -0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Marcia Ymanaka Barretto To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem with speed References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54" X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Accept-Language: en X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please find attached the .pine-debug1 when the problem occured. It took almost 1:30min to get back to work. Can you tell me something? Thank you. Marcia Scott Leibrand wrote: > Although someone might have some ideas as to why this is occurring, > we'll probably need some debugging info to help determine the cause of > the problem. To help determine the cause of delays like this, run Pine in > debug level 9 by using the -d 9 flag (i.e. "pine -d 9"), and then examine > the .pine-debug1 file. > > -- > Scott Leibrand > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Dennis Gurgul wrote: > > > > > We had the same problem on a Digital machine, using Pine 3.95. Rebooting > > fixed it (for now). Delays weren't as drastic (maybe a minute), but > > similar behavior. I'd like to know what causes this also. > > > > Dennis J. Gurgul > > Helix Server Management > > 617.724.3169 > > > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Marcia Ymanaka Barretto wrote: > > > > > We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to > > > start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even > > > browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press > > > the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not > > > touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it > > > continues browsing the message. > > > > > > Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem? > > > Does anybody know how to fix it? > > > > > > Thank you for any suggestion. > > > Marcia > > > > > > -- > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > > > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > --------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="myb-pine-debug1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="myb-pine-debug1" Debug output of the Pine program (debug=9 debug_imap=4). Version 4.10 Tue Oct 10 18:01:32 2000 reading_pinerc "/usr/local/lib/pine.conf" Open failed: No such file or directory reading_pinerc "/users/abel/.pinerc" Read 15324 characters: folder-collections : mail/[] feature-list : enable-suspend sort-key : Arrival/Reverse character-set : ISO-8859-1 last-time-prune-ques : 100.10 last-version-used : 4.10 default-saved-msg-fo : saved-Oct-98 read_pinerc: pinerc_written = 970463284 reading_pinerc "/usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed" Open failed: No such file or directory set_current_val(var num=5, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=2, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=40, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=36, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=37, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=38, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=88, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=42, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=personal-print-command set_current_val(var num=44, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=standard-printer counted 1 items set_current_val(var num=41, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=45, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=47, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=48, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=50, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=51, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=52, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=53, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=49, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=55, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=11, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=13, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=15, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=16, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=33, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=editor set_current_val(var num=34, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=39, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=82, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=url-viewers set_current_val(var num=3, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=smtp-server set_current_val(var num=22, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=default-composer-hdrs set_current_val(var num=23, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=customized-hdrs set_current_val(var num=56, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=58, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=display-filters set_current_val(var num=59, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=sending-filters set_current_val(var num=60, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=alt-addresses set_current_val(var num=61, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=addressbook-formats set_current_val(var num=84, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=57, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=62, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=43, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=63, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=64, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=35, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=65, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=85, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=76, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=66, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=67, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=68, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=69, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=12, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=89, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=90, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=17, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=32, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=86, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=patterns set_current_val(var num=18, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=global-address-book set_current_val(var num=19, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=address-book counted 1 items set_current_val(var num=54, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=forced-abook-entry set_current_val(var num=83, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=disable-these-drivers set_current_val(var num=4, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=nntp-server set_current_val(var num=24, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=viewer-hdrs set_current_val(var num=70, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=71, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=72, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=73, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=74, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=75, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=77, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=78, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=79, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=80, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=46, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=87, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=93, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=14, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=10, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=pruned-folders set_current_val(var num=9, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=incoming-archive-folders set_current_val(var num=6, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=incoming-folders set_current_val(var num=8, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=news-collections set_current_val(var num=7, expand=1, cmdline=1) is_list: name=folder-collections counted 1 items set_current_val(var num=27, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=25, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=26, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=28, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=29, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=31, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=30, expand=1, cmdline=1) set_current_val(var num=21, expand=0, cmdline=1) is_list: name=initial-keystroke-list ======= Current_val options set ======= inbox-path : inbox folder-collections : mail/[] default-fcc : sent-mail default-saved-msg-fo : saved-Oct-98 postponed-folder : postponed-msgs mail-directory : mail signature-file : .signature address-book : .addressbook feature-list : enable-suspend saved-msg-name-rule : default-folder fcc-name-rule : default-fcc sort-key : Arrival addrbook-sort-rule : fullname-with-lists-last folder-sort-rule : alphabetical character-set : ISO-8859-1 composer-wrap-column : 74 reply-indent-string : > reply-leadin : default empty-header-message : Undisclosed recipients use-only-domain-name : no printer : attached-to-ansi standard-printer : lp last-time-prune-ques : 100.10 last-version-used : 4.10 bugs-fullname : Pine Developers bugs-address : pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu suggest-fullname : Pine Developers suggest-address : pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu local-fullname : Local Support local-address : postmaster kblock-passwd-count : 1 viewer-overlap : 2 scroll-margin : 0 status-message-delay : 0 mail-check-interval : 150 user-input-timeout : 0 remote-abook-history : 3 elm-style-save : no header-in-reply : no feature-level : sapling old-style-reply : no save-by-sender : no ======= Command_line_val options set ======= ======= User_val options set (/users/abel/.pinerc) ======= folder-collections : mail/[] default-saved-msg-fo : saved-Oct-98 feature-list : enable-suspend sort-key : Arrival/Reverse character-set : ISO-8859-1 last-time-prune-ques : 100.10 last-version-used : 4.10 ======= Global_val options set (/usr/local/lib/pine.conf) ======= inbox-path : inbox folder-collections : mail/[] default-fcc : sent-mail default-saved-msg-fo : saved-messages postponed-folder : postponed-msgs mail-directory : mail signature-file : .signature address-book : .addressbook saved-msg-name-rule : default-folder fcc-name-rule : default-fcc sort-key : arrival addrbook-sort-rule : fullname-with-lists-last folder-sort-rule : alphabetical composer-wrap-column : 74 reply-indent-string : > reply-leadin : default empty-header-message : Undisclosed recipients use-only-domain-name : no printer : attached-to-ansi standard-printer : lp bugs-fullname : Pine Developers bugs-address : pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu suggest-fullname : Pine Developers suggest-address : pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu local-fullname : Local Support local-address : postmaster kblock-passwd-count : 1 viewer-overlap : 2 scroll-margin : 0 status-message-delay : 0 mail-check-interval : 150 user-input-timeout : 0 remote-abook-history : 3 elm-style-save : no header-in-reply : no feature-level : sapling old-style-reply : no save-by-sender : no ======= Fixed_val options set (NO pine.conf.fixed) ======= ========== Feature settings ========== no-compose-cut-from-cursor no-compose-maps-delete-key-to-ctrl-d no-compose-rejects-unqualified-addrs no-compose-send-offers-first-filter no-enable-alternate-editor-cmd no-enable-alternate-editor-implicitly no-enable-search-and-replace no-enable-sigdashes no-quell-dead-letter-on-cancel no-quell-user-lookup-in-passwd-file no-enable-reply-indent-string-editing no-include-attachments-in-reply no-include-header-in-reply no-include-text-in-reply no-reply-always-uses-reply-to no-signature-at-bottom no-strip-from-sigdashes-on-reply no-enable-8bit-esmtp-negotiation no-enable-background-sending no-enable-delivery-status-notification no-enable-verbose-smtp-posting no-fcc-on-bounce no-fcc-only-without-confirm no-fcc-without-attachments no-use-sender-not-x-sender no-combined-subdirectory-display no-combined-folder-display no-enable-dot-folders no-enable-incoming-folders no-enable-lame-list-mode no-expanded-view-of-folders no-quell-empty-directories no-separate-folder-and-directory-entries no-single-column-folder-list no-vertical-folder-list no-combined-addrbook-display no-expanded-view-of-addressbooks no-expanded-view-of-distribution-lists no-auto-open-next-unread no-delete-skips-deleted no-enable-cruise-mode no-enable-cruise-mode-delete no-tab-visits-next-new-message-only no-enable-msg-view-attachments no-enable-msg-view-urls no-enable-msg-view-web-hostnames no-enable-msg-view-addresses no-enable-msg-view-forced-arrows no-pass-control-characters-as-is no-compose-sets-newsgroup-without-confirm no-enable-8bit-nntp-posting no-news-approximates-new-status no-news-deletes-across-groups no-news-post-without-validation no-news-read-in-newsrc-order no-enable-print-via-y-command no-print-offers-custom-cmd-prompt no-print-includes-from-line no-print-index-enabled no-print-formfeed-between-messages no-enable-aggregate-command-set no-enable-arrow-navigation no-enable-arrow-navigation-relaxed no-enable-bounce-cmd no-enable-exit-via-lessthan-command no-enable-flag-cmd no-enable-flag-screen-implicitly no-enable-full-header-cmd no-enable-goto-in-file-browser no-enable-jump-shortcut no-enable-partial-match-lists no-enable-tab-completion no-enable-unix-pipe-cmd no-allow-talk no-assume-slow-link no-auto-move-read-msgs no-auto-unzoom-after-apply no-auto-zoom-after-select no-confirm-role-even-for-default no-enable-dot-files no-enable-fast-recent-test no-enable-mail-check-cue no-enable-mouse-in-xterm no-enable-newmail-in-xterm-icon enable-suspend no-expunge-without-confirm no-expunge-without-confirm-everywhere no-preserve-start-stop-characters no-quell-folder-internal-msg no-quell-lock-failure-warnings no-quell-status-message-beeping no-quit-without-confirm no-save-will-advance no-save-will-not-delete no-save-will-quote-leading-froms no-select-without-confirm no-show-cursor no-show-plain-text-internally no-show-selected-in-boldface no-use-current-dir no-use-function-keys no-use-subshell-for-suspend no-allow-changing-from no-disable-config-cmd no-disable-busy-alarm no-disable-keyboard-lock-cmd no-disable-keymenu no-disable-password-cmd no-disable-roles-setup-cmd no-disable-roles-sig-edit no-disable-roles-template-edit no-disable-take-last-comma-first no-disable-signature-edit-cmd no-quell-imap-envelope-update no-quell-partial-fetching no-save-aggregates-copy-sequence no-termdef-takes-precedence Userid: abel Fullname: "Abel L. Packer" User domain name being used "" Local Domain name being used "bireme.br" Host name being used "brm.bireme.br" Mail Domain name being used (by c-client too)"brm.bireme.br" Context mail/%s: serv:"", ref:"", view: "" init_signals() new win size -----<24 80>------ Terminal type: vt100 Scroll mode: InsertDelete Context mail/%s: serv:"", ref:"", view: "" ***** context mail/%s LABEL: Local folders in mail/ 1) inbox set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 (null) (null) 14 3 > [ListFldrs 13 4 P PrevCmd 27 5 N NextCmd 27 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 R RelNotes 53 9 K KBLock 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 About to open folder "INBOX" inbox: "INBOX" busy_alarm(1, Opening "INBOX", 00000000, 1) q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" ) output_message(Opening "INBOX" ) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel === mm_exists(1473,/var/mail/abel) called === Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel Opened folder 4003a160 "/var/mail/abel" (context: "mail/%s") Opened folder "/var/mail/abel" with 1473 messages cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" DONE) comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" q_status_message(Folder "INBOX" opened with 1,473 message) Sorting by Arrival/reverse First_sorted_flagged returning winner = 1 ==== expire_mail called ==== same_stream: /users/abel/.pine-interrupted-mail == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- MAIN_MENU_SCREEN ---- new mail called (0 2 3) check_point(VeryBadTime) Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:01:41 2000 New mail checked Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:01:41 2000 ******** new mail returning -1 ******** set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" STATUS: diff:-8, displayed: 971211693, now: 971211701 d_q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" ) d_q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" DONE) output_message(Folder "INBOX" opened with 1,473 messages) STATUS cmd:120, max:4, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 105 i Read command returning: 105 i New_mail_count zeroed ---- MAIL INDEX ---- ---- INDEX MANAGER ---- new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(1) returns:"1" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" === setup_header_widths(1473) === === format_index_line(1,1473) === === setup_header_widths(1473) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:12:12 -0700" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:12 sec:12 comatose(1588) returns:"1,588" INDEX(4006dab0) -->+ N 1 Oct 10 Jorge Walters Gast (1,588) Varios... <-- (80), 235563716> === format_index_line(2,1472) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:04:22 -0700" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:4 sec:22 comatose(1635) returns:"1,635" INDEX(4006db08) -->+ N 2 Oct 10 Jorge Walters Gast (1,635) Reunion con Anna Maria <-- (80), 230254777> === format_index_line(3,1471) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:49:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:49 sec:33 comatose(3009) returns:"3,009" INDEX(4006db60) -->+ N 3 Oct 10 Tardelli, Adalbert (3,009) FW: III Reunión del Grupo Internacio<-- (80), 40158192> === format_index_line(4,1470) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:12:54 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:12 sec:54 comatose(7038) returns:"7,038" INDEX(4006dbb8) -->+ N 4 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (7,038) FW: PAHO OBSERVES WORLD MENTAL HEALT<-- (80), 97991983> === format_index_line(5,1469) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:06:00 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:6 sec:0 comatose(2256) returns:"2,256" INDEX(4006dc10) --> N 5 Oct 10 Bert Hiddink (2,256) Re: manual about wxis in english <-- (80), 224982074> === format_index_line(6,1468) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:41:15 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:41 sec:15 comatose(9153) returns:"9,153" INDEX(4006dc68) --> N 6 Oct 10 Reforme (9,153) Montevideo entre todos (II) <-- (80), 180722685> === format_index_line(7,1467) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:30:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:30 sec:6 comatose(47433) returns:"47,433" INDEX(4006dcc0) --> N 7 Oct 10 Mariana Rocha Bioj (47,433) Revision SciELO CR <-- (80), 158625056> === format_index_line(8,1466) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:13:18 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:13 sec:18 comatose(200) returns:"200" INDEX(4006dd18) --> N 8 Oct 10 Mariana Rocha Bioj (200K) SciELO and BMJ <-- (80), 145026443> === format_index_line(9,1465) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:09:52 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:9 sec:52 comatose(2533) returns:"2,533" INDEX(4006dd70) --> N 9 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (2,533) Re: 2001 Indexing Orientation (fwd) <-- (80), 194151115> === format_index_line(10,1464) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:09:55 +0200" to.. hours_off_gmt:2 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:21 min:9 sec:55 comatose(58742) returns:"58,742" INDEX(4006ddc8) --> N 10 Oct 10 Declan Butler, Nat (58,742) Extension of deadline <-- (80), 86150237> === format_index_line(11,1463) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:04:00 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:16 min:4 sec:0 comatose(91837) returns:"91,837" INDEX(4006de20) -->+ N 11 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (91,837) FW: WUN Monthly Report Aug-Sept 2000<-- (80), 135162502> === format_index_line(12,1462) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:03:49 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:16 min:3 sec:49 comatose(39688) returns:"39,688" INDEX(4006de78) -->+ N 12 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (39,688) FW: JC E-Mail, 1645, de 10 de outubr<-- (80), 125950554> === format_index_line(13,1461) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:42:34 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:16 min:42 sec:34 comatose(2720) returns:"2,720" INDEX(4006ded0) -->+ N 13 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (2,720) PINE <-- (80), 124658240> === format_index_line(14,1460) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:47:03 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:47 sec:3 comatose(2326) returns:"2,326" INDEX(4006df28) -->+ N 14 Oct 10 Packer, Abel Laert (2,326) FW: Indexing of SciELO journals <-- (80), 24932232> === format_index_line(15,1459) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:41:39 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:41 sec:39 comatose(7112) returns:"7,112" INDEX(4006df80) -->+ N 15 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (7,112) FW: América Latina y el Caribe profu<-- (80), 122788006> === format_index_line(16,1458) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:56:04 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:56 sec:4 comatose(466) returns:"466" INDEX(4006dfd8) -->+ N 16 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (466) Responder ana Maria <-- (80), 257708824> === format_index_line(17,1457) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:43:49 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:43 sec:49 comatose(458) returns:"458" INDEX(4006e030) -->+ N 17 Oct 10 Mariana Rocha Bioj (458K) Documentacao DTD <-- (80), 235132229> === format_index_line(18,1456) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:45:11 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:45 sec:11 comatose(878) returns:"878" INDEX(4006e088) -->+ 18 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (878) bmj <-- (80), 29585361> === format_index_line(19,1455) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:40:36 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:40 sec:36 comatose(2323) returns:"2,323" INDEX(4006e0e0) -->+ N 19 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 <-- (80), 66505608> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 STATUS: diff:-3, displayed: 971211701, now: 971211704 d_q_status_message(Folder "INBOX" opened with 1,473 message) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 32 Read command returning: 32 New_mail_count zeroed new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(20) returns:"20" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" === format_index_line(20,1454) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:07:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:7 sec:33 comatose(143) returns:"143" INDEX(4006e138) -->+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers<-- (80), 189881479> === format_index_line(21,1453) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:31:56 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:31 sec:56 comatose(621) returns:"621" INDEX(4006e190) -->+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp <-- (80), 20846348> === format_index_line(22,1452) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:19:41 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:19 sec:41 comatose(4355) returns:"4,355" INDEX(4006e1e8) --> N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 <-- (80), 135627198> === format_index_line(23,1451) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:29:18 -0200 (BRDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-2 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:29 sec:18 comatose(2464) returns:"2,464" INDEX(4006e240) --> N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida <-- (80), 231703483> === format_index_line(24,1450) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:40:42 +0100" to.. hours_off_gmt:1 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:40 sec:42 comatose(2152) returns:"2,152" INDEX(4006e298) -->+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias <-- (80), 252630435> === format_index_line(25,1449) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24 comatose(3994) returns:"3,994" INDEX(4006e2f0) -->+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105489> === format_index_line(26,1448) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:32:02 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:32 sec:2 comatose(5231) returns:"5,231" INDEX(4006e348) --> N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco<-- (80), 164004389> === format_index_line(27,1447) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:16:46 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:16 sec:46 comatose(7518) returns:"7,518" INDEX(4006e3a0) --> N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave<-- (80), 81677039> === format_index_line(28,1446) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35 comatose(4746) returns:"4,746" INDEX(4006e3f8) -->+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21550823> === format_index_line(29,1445) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27 comatose(1695) returns:"1,695" INDEX(4006e450) -->+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103860853> === format_index_line(30,1444) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23 comatose(3738) returns:"3,738" INDEX(4006e4a8) --> N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713684> === format_index_line(31,1443) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:37:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:37 sec:6 comatose(2050) returns:"2,050" INDEX(4006e500) -->+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro <-- (80), 127876467> === format_index_line(32,1442) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:49:39 -0700 (PDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:6 min:49 sec:39 comatose(8003) returns:"8,003" INDEX(4006e558) -->+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out<-- (80), 224804631> === format_index_line(33,1441) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:33:52 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:33 sec:52 comatose(860) returns:"860" INDEX(4006e5b0) -->+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) <-- (80), 197679491> === format_index_line(34,1440) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:31:32 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:31 sec:32 comatose(2378) returns:"2,378" INDEX(4006e608) --> N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao <-- (80), 262852050> === format_index_line(35,1439) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:48:12 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:48 sec:12 comatose(3737) returns:"3,737" INDEX(4006e660) -->+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano <-- (80), 83007618> === format_index_line(36,1438) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:16:08 EDT" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:16 sec:8 comatose(2563) returns:"2,563" INDEX(4006e6b8) --> N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) <-- (80), 243080280> === format_index_line(37,1437) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:01:38 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:1 sec:38 comatose(1538) returns:"1,538" INDEX(4006e710) -->+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri<-- (80), 43994603> === format_index_line(38,1436) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:00:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:0 sec:33 comatose(1348) returns:"1,348" INDEX(4006e768) --> N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11<-- (80), 2629033> STATUS cmd:32, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2068 Left Arrow Read command returning: 2068 Left Arrow New_mail_count zeroed q_status_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for thi) new mail called (0 2 1) Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> output_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for this screen. Use ? for help) STATUS cmd:2068, max:2, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2068 Left Arrow Read command returning: 2068 Left Arrow New_mail_count zeroed new mail called (0 2 1) Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> output_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for this screen. Use ? for help) STATUS cmd:2068, max:2, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(21) returns:"21" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211706, now: 971211707 d_q_status_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for thi) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(22) returns:"22" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(23) returns:"23" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(24) returns:"24" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(25) returns:"25" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 13 RETURN Read command returning: 13 RETURN New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((505)ù) - ----- MAIL VIEW ----- busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. comatose(7) returns:"7" busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) @@@@ current:25 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 68 comatose(25) returns:"25" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 0 1) - adrbk_maintenance - check_point(GoodTime) freq 12 tm 420 changes 2 since_1st_change 0 since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 51 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 51 (tenths) Check:if changes(2)xadj_cca(51) >= freq(12)x200 is 102 >= 2400 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 105 i Read command returning: 105 i New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((504)ø) - PROCESS_CMD return: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- MAIL INDEX ---- ---- INDEX MANAGER ---- new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(25) returns:"25" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" === setup_header_widths(1473) === Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> === format_index_line(25,1449) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24 comatose(3994) returns:"3,994" INDEX(4006e2f0) -->+ 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105443> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 102 f Read command returning: 102 f New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((706)Â) - - forward - checking subject: "Nuevo bebe!!!" open_patterns() get_signature(/users/abel/.signature) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) === send called === set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" flags: 80000040 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- COMPOSER ---- fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ Clearing status line STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1 New_mail_count zeroed new mail called (0 2 3) ... composer returns (0x2) fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ init_signals() busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) pine_send:CANCEL handling -- pine_rfc822_output busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 3248 bytes -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. q_status_message(Message cancelled and copied to "dead.le) === send returning === new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(25) returns:"25" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105443> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 output_message(Message cancelled and copied to "dead.letter" file) STATUS cmd:102, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 100 d Read command returning: 100 d New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((702)Ÿ) - - delete message - DELETE: msg 1449 q_status_message(Message 25 marked for deletion) new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(26) returns:"26" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> === format_index_line(25,1449) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24 comatose(3994) returns:"3,994" INDEX(4006e2f0) -->+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211714, now: 971211715 d_q_status_message(Message cancelled and copied to "dead.le) output_message(Message 25 marked for deletion) STATUS cmd:100, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 100 d Read command returning: 100 d New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((702)Ÿ) - - delete message - DELETE: msg 1448 q_status_message(Message 26 marked for deletion) new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(27) returns:"27" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> === format_index_line(26,1448) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:32:02 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:32 sec:2 comatose(5231) returns:"5,231" INDEX(4006e348) --> D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco<-- (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS: diff:-3, displayed: 971211715, now: 971211718 d_q_status_message(Message 25 marked for deletion) output_message(Message 26 marked for deletion) STATUS cmd:100, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 100 d Read command returning: 100 d New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((702)Ÿ) - - delete message - DELETE: msg 1447 q_status_message(Message 27 marked for deletion) new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(28) returns:"28" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> === format_index_line(27,1447) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:16:46 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:16 sec:46 comatose(7518) returns:"7,518" INDEX(4006e3a0) --> D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave<-- (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS: diff:-2, displayed: 971211718, now: 971211720 d_q_status_message(Message 26 marked for deletion) output_message(Message 27 marked for deletion) STATUS cmd:100, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 13 RETURN Read command returning: 13 RETURN New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((505)ù) - ----- MAIL VIEW ----- busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. comatose(108) returns:"108" suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) @@@@ current:28 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 114 comatose(28) returns:"28" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 0 1) - adrbk_maintenance - check_point(GoodTime) freq 12 tm 420 changes 7 since_1st_change 11 since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 11 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 11 (tenths) Check:if changes(7)xadj_cca(11) >= freq(12)x200 is 77 >= 2400 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211720, now: 971211721 d_q_status_message(Message 27 marked for deletion) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) check_point(VeryBadTime) freq 48 tm 1260 changes 7 since_1st_change 27 since_status_chg 160 chk_cnt_ave 11 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 85 (tenths) Check:if changes(7)xadj_cca(85) >= freq(48)x200 is 595 >= 9600 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:28 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 105 i Read command returning: 105 i New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((504)ø) - PROCESS_CMD return: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- MAIL INDEX ---- ---- INDEX MANAGER ---- new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(28) returns:"28" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" === setup_header_widths(1473) === Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> === format_index_line(28,1446) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35 comatose(4746) returns:"4,746" INDEX(4006e3f8) -->+ 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21550777> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 115 s Read command returning: 115 s New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((714)Ê) - - saving message - === optionally_enter called === string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1 passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #28 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs" suspend_busy_alarm 0 ^G Help 0 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 ^T To Fldrs 14 3 Ret Accept 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 108 l Read char returning: 101 e Read char returning: 103 g Read char returning: 105 i Read char returning: 115 s Read char returning: 108 l Read char returning: 97 a Read char returning: 99 c Read char returning: 97 a Read char returning: 111 o Read char returning: 13 RETURN resume_busy_alarm same_stream: mail/legislacao == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) mm_list "mail/legislacao": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked cancel_busy_alarm(-1) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) same_stream: mail/legislacao == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice same_stream: mail/legislacao == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice Done with IMAP critical on Done with IMAP critical on cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Message 28 copied to folder "legislacao") new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(28) returns:"28" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> === format_index_line(28,1446) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35 comatose(4746) returns:"4,746" INDEX(4006e3f8) -->+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21550813> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 output_message(Message 28 copied to folder "legislacao" and deleted) STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(29) returns:"29" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211750, now: 971211750 d_q_status_message(Message 28 copied to folder "legislacao") Clearing status line STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 13 RETURN Read command returning: 13 RETURN New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((505)ù) - ----- MAIL VIEW ----- busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. comatose(38) returns:"38" suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) @@@@ current:29 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 44 comatose(29) returns:"29" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 0 1) - adrbk_maintenance - check_point(GoodTime) freq 12 tm 420 changes 11 since_1st_change 40 since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 6 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 6 (tenths) Check:if changes(11)xadj_cca(6) >= freq(12)x200 is 66 >= 2400 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 105 i Read command returning: 105 i New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((504)ø) - PROCESS_CMD return: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- MAIL INDEX ---- ---- INDEX MANAGER ---- new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(29) returns:"29" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" === setup_header_widths(1473) === Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813> === format_index_line(29,1445) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27 comatose(1695) returns:"1,695" INDEX(4006e450) -->+ 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103860807> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 115 s Read command returning: 115 s New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((714)Ê) - - saving message - === optionally_enter called === string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1 passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #29 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs" suspend_busy_alarm 0 ^G Help 0 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 ^T To Fldrs 14 3 Ret Accept 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 112 p Read char returning: 101 e Read char returning: 115 s Read char returning: 115 s Read char returning: 111 o Read char returning: 97 a Read char returning: 108 l Read char returning: 13 RETURN resume_busy_alarm same_stream: mail/pessoal == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) mm_list "mail/pessoal": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked cancel_busy_alarm(-1) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) same_stream: mail/pessoal == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice same_stream: mail/pessoal == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice Done with IMAP critical on Done with IMAP critical on cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Message 29 copied to folder "pessoal" an) new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(29) returns:"29" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813> === format_index_line(29,1445) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27 comatose(1695) returns:"1,695" INDEX(4006e450) -->+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103860843> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 output_message(Message 29 copied to folder "pessoal" and deleted) STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(30) returns:"30" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211761, now: 971211761 d_q_status_message(Message 29 copied to folder "pessoal" an) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 13 RETURN Read command returning: 13 RETURN New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((505)ù) - ----- MAIL VIEW ----- busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. comatose(62) returns:"62" suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) @@@@ current:30 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 68 comatose(30) returns:"30" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 0 1) - adrbk_maintenance - check_point(GoodTime) freq 12 tm 420 changes 15 since_1st_change 53 since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths) Check:if changes(15)xadj_cca(7) >= freq(12)x200 is 105 >= 2400 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) check_point(VeryBadTime) freq 48 tm 1260 changes 15 since_1st_change 99 since_status_chg 460 chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths) Check:if changes(15)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200 is 3000 >= 9600 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:30 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 102 f Read command returning: 102 f New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((706)Â) - - forward - checking subject: "[Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao" open_patterns() get_signature(/users/abel/.signature) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) === send called === set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" flags: 80000040 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- COMPOSER ---- fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ Clearing status line STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1 New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed - build_address - (brmdir) - build_address_internal - (brmdir) - init_ab_if_needed - -- init_addrbooks(Closed, 0, 0, 1) -- - addrbook_access - - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was TotallyClosed, want Closed - warp_to_beginning - - save_state - - expand_address - (brmdir) - adrbk_lookup_with_opens_by_nick(brmdir) - - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want NoDisplay - adrbk_open(/users/abel/.addressbook) - copy_file(/users/abel/.addressbook, 0) - - valid_hfile - - get_timestamp_from_disk - - valid_hfile - - get_timestamp_from_disk - busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) - bld_hash_from_ondisk_hash - initializing hash_by_nick initializing hash_by_addr cancel_busy_alarm(-1) - init_entryref_cache - - adrbk_set_nominal_cachesize - was 0 now 82 - init_entryref_cache - - clear_entryref_cache - - adrbk_is_in_sort_order - - get_sort_rule_from_disk - Address book .addressbook (/users/abel/.addressbook) opened with 82 items - adrbk_clearrefs - - adrbk_lookup_by_nick(brmdir) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_lookup_by_addr(brmdir@brm.bireme.br) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) - - restore_state - - init_disp_form(.addressbook) - - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was NoDisplay, want Closed - adrbk_partial_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - init_entryref_cache - - clear_entryref_cache - - warp_to_dlc(0) - New_mail_count zeroed - build_address - () fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ suspend_busy_alarm 0 ? Help 1 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 Y [Yes] 13 3 N No 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 121 y Want_to read: y (121) resume_busy_alarm ... composer returns (0x4) fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ init_signals() busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) === sending: build_folder_list: mail/%s sent-mail busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) mm_list "mail/sent-mail": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Sending mail... busy_alarm(1, Sending mail, 4002ae4a, 1) q_status_message(Sending mail | |) output_message(Sending mail | |) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 call_mailer: via "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" Opening pipe: "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" (WRNP) PID: 21913, COMMAND: /usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 220 brm.bireme.br ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:03:37 -0300 (SAT) IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: EHLO localhost IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-brm.bireme.br Hello abel@localhost, pleased to meet you IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-EXPN IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-VERB IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-8BITMIME IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-SIZE IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-DSN IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-ONEX IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-ETRN IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-XUSR IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 HELP Opened SMTP server "brm.bireme.br" IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: RSET IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 Reset state IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: MAIL FROM: IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 ... Sender ok IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: RCPT TO: IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 ... Recipient ok IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: DATA IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself -- pine_rfc822_output busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 2546 bytes -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset 8bit_qp -- gf_pipe: done. IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: . IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 SAA21914 Message accepted for delivery IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: QUIT SIGCHLD raised IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 221 brm.bireme.br closing connection cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |) Writing Fcc busy_alarm(1, Writing Fcc, 00000000, 1) q_status_message(Writing Fcc ) STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211817, now: 971211817 d_q_status_message(Sending mail | |) d_q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |) output_message(Writing Fcc ) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 same_stream: mail/sent-mail == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice Done with IMAP critical on Done with IMAP critical on cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE) done. q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) === send returning === PROCESS_CMD return: 0 @@@@ current:30 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 35 total_pl: 68 comatose(30) returns:"30" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211817, now: 971211818 d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc ) d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE) output_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) STATUS cmd:102, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 114 r Read command returning: 114 r New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((705)Á) - comatose(1) returns:"1" - reply (1 msgs) - suspend_busy_alarm d_q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) 0 (null) (null) 2 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 Y Yes 13 3 N [No] 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 121 y Want_to read: y (121) resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm 0 (null) (null) 2 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 Y [Yes] 13 3 N No 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 121 y Want_to read: y (121) resume_busy_alarm - build_address - ("'gerentes-l@listas.bireme.br'" ) - adrbk_check_and_fix_all - - adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - build_address_internal - ("'gerentes-l@listas.bireme.br'" ) - init_ab_if_needed - - save_state - - expand_address - ("'gerentes-l@listas.bireme.br'" ) - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want NoDisplay - adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_lookup_by_addr(gerentes-l@listas.bireme.br) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) - adrbk_get_entryref(/users/abel/.addressbook) - elem=67 (Normal) adrbk_get_entryref(/users/abel/.addressbook) - elem=42 (Normal) - adrbk_get_ae - adrbk_get_entryref(/users/abel/.addressbook) - elem=42 (Normal) - restore_state - - init_disp_form(.addressbook) - - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was NoDisplay, want Closed - adrbk_partial_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - init_entryref_cache - - clear_entryref_cache - - warp_to_dlc(0) - open_patterns() get_signature(/users/abel/.signature) Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23 busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset prefix -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) === send called === set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" flags: 80000040 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- COMPOSER ---- fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ Clearing status line STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1 New_mail_count zeroed fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ suspend_busy_alarm 0 ? Help 1 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 Y [Yes] 13 3 N No 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 121 y Want_to read: y (121) resume_busy_alarm ... composer returns (0x5) fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ init_signals() busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) === sending: build_folder_list: mail/%s sent-mail busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) mm_list "mail/sent-mail": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Sending mail... busy_alarm(1, Sending mail, 4002ae4a, 1) q_status_message(Sending mail | |) output_message(Sending mail | |) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 call_mailer: via "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" Opening pipe: "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" (WRNP) PID: 21917, COMMAND: /usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 220 brm.bireme.br ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:04:10 -0300 (SAT) IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: EHLO localhost IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-brm.bireme.br Hello abel@localhost, pleased to meet you IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-EXPN IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-VERB IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-8BITMIME IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-SIZE IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-DSN IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-ONEX IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-ETRN IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-XUSR IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 HELP Opened SMTP server "brm.bireme.br" IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: RSET IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 Reset state IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: MAIL FROM: IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 ... Sender ok IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: RCPT TO: IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 ... Recipient ok IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: DATA IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself -- pine_rfc822_output busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 2508 bytes -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset 8bit_qp -- gf_pipe: done. IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: . IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 SAA21918 Message accepted for delivery IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: QUIT SIGCHLD raised IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 221 brm.bireme.br closing connection cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |) Writing Fcc busy_alarm(1, Writing Fcc, 00000000, 1) q_status_message(Writing Fcc ) STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211850 d_q_status_message(Sending mail | |) d_q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |) output_message(Writing Fcc ) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 same_stream: mail/sent-mail == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice Done with IMAP critical on Done with IMAP critical on cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE) done. busy_alarm(1, Updating "Answered" Flags, 00000000, 1) q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags ) STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211850 d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc ) d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE) output_message(Updating "Answered" Flags ) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags DONE) q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) === send returning === PROCESS_CMD return: 0 @@@@ current:30 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 35 total_pl: 68 comatose(30) returns:"30" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 2 1) check_point(VeryBadTime) freq 48 tm 1260 changes 17 since_1st_change 140 since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 8 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 8 (tenths) Check:if changes(17)xadj_cca(8) >= freq(48)x200 is 136 >= 9600 ? Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:04:10 2000 New mail checked Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:04:10 2000 ******** new mail returning -1 ******** STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211850 d_q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags ) d_q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags DONE) output_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) STATUS cmd:114, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 105 i Read command returning: 105 i New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((504)ø) - PROCESS_CMD return: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- MAIL INDEX ---- ---- INDEX MANAGER ---- new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(30) returns:"30" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" === setup_header_widths(1473) === Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843> === format_index_line(30,1444) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23 comatose(3738) returns:"3,738" INDEX(4006e4a8) --> A 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713671> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211851 d_q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 115 s Read command returning: 115 s New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((714)Ê) - - saving message - === optionally_enter called === string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1 passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #30 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs" suspend_busy_alarm 0 ^G Help 0 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 ^T To Fldrs 14 3 Ret Accept 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 100 d Read char returning: 8 ^H Read char returning: 103 g Read char returning: 101 e Read char returning: 114 r Read char returning: 101 e Read char returning: 110 n Read char returning: 116 t Read char returning: 101 e Read char returning: 115 s Read char returning: 13 RETURN resume_busy_alarm same_stream: mail/gerentes == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) mm_list "mail/gerentes": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked cancel_busy_alarm(-1) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) same_stream: mail/gerentes == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice same_stream: mail/gerentes == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice Done with IMAP critical on Done with IMAP critical on cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Message 30 copied to folder "gerentes" a) new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(30) returns:"30" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843> === format_index_line(30,1444) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23 comatose(3738) returns:"3,738" INDEX(4006e4a8) --> D 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713674> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 output_message(Message 30 copied to folder "gerentes" and deleted) STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(31) returns:"31" Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479> Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348> Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198> Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703483> Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435> Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479> Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379> Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029> Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813> Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843> Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < D 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713674> Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467> Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631> Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491> Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050> Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618> Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280> Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603> Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033> STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211860, now: 971211861 d_q_status_message(Message 30 copied to folder "gerentes" a) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 13 RETURN Read command returning: 13 RETURN New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((505)ù) - ----- MAIL VIEW ----- busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. comatose(46) returns:"46" suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) @@@@ current:31 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 51 comatose(31) returns:"31" comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 0 1) - adrbk_maintenance - check_point(GoodTime) freq 12 tm 420 changes 21 since_1st_change 152 since_status_chg 10 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths) Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(7) >= freq(12)x200 is 147 >= 2400 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) check_point(VeryBadTime) freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 175 since_status_chg 240 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 122 (tenths) Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(122) >= freq(48)x200 is 2562 >= 9600 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed q_status_message(END of message) @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) output_message(END of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed q_status_message(Already at end of message) @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211890, now: 971211890 d_q_status_message(END of message) output_message(Already at end of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) output_message(Already at end of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) output_message(Already at end of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) check_point(VeryBadTime) freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 215 since_status_chg 640 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths) Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200 is 4200 >= 9600 ? ******** new mail returning -1 ******** output_message(Already at end of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) output_message(Already at end of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) output_message(Already at end of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) output_message(Already at end of message) STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211925, now: 971211926 d_q_status_message(Already at end of message) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:31 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 102 f Read command returning: 102 f New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((706)Â) - - forward - checking subject: "mensagem do Pedro" open_patterns() get_signature(/users/abel/.signature) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) === send called === set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(1473) returns:"1,473" flags: 80000040 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- COMPOSER ---- fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ Clearing status line STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1 New_mail_count zeroed new mail called (0 2 3) New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed - build_address - (urra60@yahoo.com) - adrbk_check_and_fix_all - - adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - build_address_internal - (urra60@yahoo.com) - init_ab_if_needed - - save_state - - expand_address - (urra60@yahoo.com) - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want NoDisplay - adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - adrbk_lookup_by_addr(urra60@yahoo.com) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) - - restore_state - - init_disp_form(.addressbook) - - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was NoDisplay, want Closed - adrbk_partial_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - init_entryref_cache - - clear_entryref_cache - - warp_to_dlc(0) - New_mail_count zeroed - build_address - () New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed New_mail_count zeroed new mail called (0 2 3) check_point(VeryBadTime) freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 377 since_status_chg 2260 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths) Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200 is 4200 >= 9600 ? Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:08:07 2000 New mail checked Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel === mm_exists(1474,/var/mail/abel) called === Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:08:07 2000 New mail, inbox, new_mail_count:1 expunge count:0, max_msgno:1474 q_status_message(New mail! From Abel L. Packer with regar) ******** new mail returning 1 ******** fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ output_message(New mail! From Abel L. Packer with regard to [Gerentes-l] Re: [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao) STATUS cmd:32, max:60, min0 New_mail_count zeroed fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ suspend_busy_alarm d_q_status_message(New mail! From Abel L. Packer with regar) 0 ? Help 1 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 Y [Yes] 13 3 N No 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 121 y Want_to read: y (121) resume_busy_alarm ... composer returns (0x5) fix_windsize() new win size -----<24 80>------ init_signals() busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) === sending: build_folder_list: mail/%s sent-mail busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) mm_list "mail/sent-mail": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Sending mail... busy_alarm(1, Sending mail, 4002ae4a, 1) q_status_message(Sending mail | |) output_message(Sending mail | |) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 call_mailer: via "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" Opening pipe: "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" (WRNP) PID: 21965, COMMAND: /usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 220 brm.bireme.br ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:08:48 -0300 (SAT) IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: EHLO localhost IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-brm.bireme.br Hello abel@localhost, pleased to meet you IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-EXPN IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-VERB IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-8BITMIME IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-SIZE IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-DSN IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-ONEX IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-ETRN IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-XUSR IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 HELP Opened SMTP server "brm.bireme.br" IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: RSET IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 Reset state IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: MAIL FROM: IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 ... Sender ok IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: RCPT TO: IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 ... Recipient ok IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: DATA IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself -- pine_rfc822_output busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- pine_encode_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0 -- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 1836 bytes -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_pipe: done. IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: . IMAP DEBUG 18:08:49 10/10: 250 SAA21966 Message accepted for delivery IMAP DEBUG 18:08:49 10/10: QUIT SIGCHLD raised IMAP DEBUG 18:08:49 10/10: 221 brm.bireme.br closing connection cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |) Writing Fcc busy_alarm(1, Writing Fcc, 00000000, 1) q_status_message(Writing Fcc ) STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971212128, now: 971212129 d_q_status_message(Sending mail | |) d_q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |) output_message(Writing Fcc ) STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 same_stream: mail/sent-mail == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice Done with IMAP critical on Done with IMAP critical on cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE) done. q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) === send returning === PROCESS_CMD return: 0 @@@@ current:31 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 47 total_pl: 51 comatose(31) returns:"31" comatose(1474) returns:"1,474" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 2 1) check_point(VeryBadTime) freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 419 since_status_chg 2680 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths) Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200 is 4200 >= 9600 ? Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:08:49 2000 New mail checked Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:08:49 2000 New mail, inbox, new_mail_count:0 expunge count:0, max_msgno:1474 Sorting by Arrival/reverse ******** new mail returning -1 ******** STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971212129, now: 971212129 d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc ) d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE) output_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) STATUS cmd:102, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 105 i Read command returning: 105 i New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((504)ø) - PROCESS_CMD return: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- MAIL INDEX ---- ---- INDEX MANAGER ---- new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(32) returns:"32" comatose(1474) returns:"1,474" === setup_header_widths(1474) === === format_index_line(20,1455) === === setup_header_widths(1474) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:40:36 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:40 sec:36 comatose(2323) returns:"2,323" INDEX(40079db8) -->+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 <-- (80), 66507400> === format_index_line(21,1454) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:07:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:7 sec:33 comatose(143) returns:"143" INDEX(40079e10) -->+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers<-- (80), 189881735> === format_index_line(22,1453) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:31:56 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:31 sec:56 comatose(621) returns:"621" INDEX(40079e68) -->+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp <-- (80), 20846604> === format_index_line(23,1452) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:19:41 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:19 sec:41 comatose(4355) returns:"4,355" INDEX(40079ec0) --> N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 <-- (80), 135627454> === format_index_line(24,1451) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:29:18 -0200 (BRDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-2 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:29 sec:18 comatose(2464) returns:"2,464" INDEX(40079f18) --> N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida <-- (80), 231703739> === format_index_line(25,1450) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:40:42 +0100" to.. hours_off_gmt:1 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:40 sec:42 comatose(2152) returns:"2,152" INDEX(40079f70) -->+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias <-- (80), 252630691> === format_index_line(26,1449) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24 comatose(3994) returns:"3,994" INDEX(40079fc8) -->+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105735> === format_index_line(27,1448) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:32:02 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:32 sec:2 comatose(5231) returns:"5,231" INDEX(4007a020) --> D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco<-- (80), 164004635> === format_index_line(28,1447) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:16:46 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:16 sec:46 comatose(7518) returns:"7,518" INDEX(4007a078) --> D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave<-- (80), 81677285> === format_index_line(29,1446) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35 comatose(4746) returns:"4,746" INDEX(4007a0d0) -->+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21551069> === format_index_line(30,1445) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27 comatose(1695) returns:"1,695" INDEX(4007a128) -->+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103862635> === format_index_line(31,1444) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23 comatose(3738) returns:"3,738" INDEX(4007a180) --> D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713930> === format_index_line(32,1443) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:37:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:37 sec:6 comatose(2050) returns:"2,050" INDEX(4007a1d8) -->+ 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro <-- (80), 127876677> === format_index_line(33,1442) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:49:39 -0700 (PDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:6 min:49 sec:39 comatose(8003) returns:"8,003" INDEX(4007a230) -->+ N 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out<-- (80), 224804887> === format_index_line(34,1441) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:33:52 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:33 sec:52 comatose(860) returns:"860" INDEX(4007a288) -->+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) <-- (80), 197679747> === format_index_line(35,1440) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:31:32 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:31 sec:32 comatose(2378) returns:"2,378" INDEX(4007a2e0) --> N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao <-- (80), 262852306> === format_index_line(36,1439) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:48:12 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:48 sec:12 comatose(3737) returns:"3,737" INDEX(4007a338) -->+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano <-- (80), 83007874> === format_index_line(37,1438) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:16:08 EDT" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:16 sec:8 comatose(2563) returns:"2,563" INDEX(4007a390) --> N 37 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) <-- (80), 243080536> === format_index_line(38,1437) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:01:38 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:1 sec:38 comatose(1538) returns:"1,538" INDEX(4007a3e8) -->+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri<-- (80), 43994859> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971212129, now: 971212130 d_q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 115 s Read command returning: 115 s New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((714)Ê) - - saving message - === optionally_enter called === string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1 passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #32 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs" suspend_busy_alarm 0 ^G Help 0 1 ^C Cancel 0 2 ^T To Fldrs 14 3 Ret Accept 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 99 c Read char returning: 114 r Read char returning: 105 i Read char returning: 99 c Read char returning: 115 s Read char returning: 51 3 Read char returning: 8 ^H Read char returning: 52 4 Read char returning: 8 ^H Read char returning: 53 5 Read char returning: 13 RETURN resume_busy_alarm same_stream: mail/crics5 == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) mm_list "mail/crics5": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked cancel_busy_alarm(-1) busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) same_stream: mail/crics5 == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice same_stream: mail/crics5 == /var/mail/abel same_stream: no dice Done with IMAP critical on Done with IMAP critical on cancel_busy_alarm(0) q_status_message(Message 32 copied to folder "crics5" and) new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(32) returns:"32" comatose(1474) returns:"1,474" Hit: Returning 40079db8 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 (80), 66507400> Hit: Returning 40079e10 -> <+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881735> Hit: Returning 40079e68 -> <+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846604> Hit: Returning 40079ec0 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627454> Hit: Returning 40079f18 -> < N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703739> Hit: Returning 40079f70 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630691> Hit: Returning 40079fc8 -> <+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105735> Hit: Returning 4007a020 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004635> Hit: Returning 4007a078 -> < D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677285> Hit: Returning 4007a0d0 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21551069> Hit: Returning 4007a128 -> <+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103862635> Hit: Returning 4007a180 -> < D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713930> === format_index_line(32,1443) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:37:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:37 sec:6 comatose(2050) returns:"2,050" INDEX(4007a1d8) -->+ D 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro <-- (80), 127876713> Hit: Returning 4007a230 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804887> Hit: Returning 4007a288 -> <+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679747> Hit: Returning 4007a2e0 -> < N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852306> Hit: Returning 4007a338 -> <+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007874> Hit: Returning 4007a390 -> < N 37 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080536> Hit: Returning 4007a3e8 -> <+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994859> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 output_message(Message 32 copied to folder "crics5" and deleted) STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((700)Œ) - new mail called (0 2 1) comatose(33) returns:"33" Hit: Returning 40079db8 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 (80), 66507400> Hit: Returning 40079e10 -> <+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881735> Hit: Returning 40079e68 -> <+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846604> Hit: Returning 40079ec0 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627454> Hit: Returning 40079f18 -> < N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703739> Hit: Returning 40079f70 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630691> Hit: Returning 40079fc8 -> <+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105735> Hit: Returning 4007a020 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004635> Hit: Returning 4007a078 -> < D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677285> Hit: Returning 4007a0d0 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21551069> Hit: Returning 4007a128 -> <+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103862635> Hit: Returning 4007a180 -> < D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713930> Hit: Returning 4007a1d8 -> <+ D 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876713> Hit: Returning 4007a230 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804887> Hit: Returning 4007a288 -> <+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679747> Hit: Returning 4007a2e0 -> < N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852306> Hit: Returning 4007a338 -> <+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007874> Hit: Returning 4007a390 -> < N 37 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080536> Hit: Returning 4007a3e8 -> <+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994859> STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971212135, now: 971212136 d_q_status_message(Message 32 copied to folder "crics5" and) Clearing status line STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 13 RETURN Read command returning: 13 RETURN New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((505)ù) - ----- MAIL VIEW ----- busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Multipart/MIXED) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist comatose(9) returns:"9" - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Multipart/REPORT) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist comatose(10) returns:"10" - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Message/DELIVERY-STATUS) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist comatose(147) returns:"147" suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset line_test -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset line_test -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset line_test -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) @@@@ current:33 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 207 comatose(33) returns:"33" comatose(1474) returns:"1,474" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 0 1) - adrbk_maintenance - check_point(GoodTime) freq 12 tm 420 changes 25 since_1st_change 426 since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths) adj_chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths) Check:if changes(25)xadj_cca(5) >= freq(12)x200 is 125 >= 2400 ? Doing checkpoint: Tue Oct 10 18:08:56 2000 Since 1st status change: 426 Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel === mm_exists(1474,/var/mail/abel) called === IMAP 18:10:16 10/10 mm_log babble: Checkpoint completed Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel Checkpoint complete: Tue Oct 10 18:10:16 2000 ******** new mail returning -1 ******** Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) check_point(VeryBadTime) ******** new mail returning -1 ******** STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow New_mail_count zeroed @@@@ current:33 new mail called (0 2 1) STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 105 i Read command returning: 105 i New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((504)ø) - PROCESS_CMD return: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- MAIL INDEX ---- ---- INDEX MANAGER ---- new mail called (0 2 1) set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0 comatose(33) returns:"33" comatose(1474) returns:"1,474" === setup_header_widths(1474) === Hit: Returning 40079db8 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 (80), 66507400> Hit: Returning 40079e10 -> <+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881735> Hit: Returning 40079e68 -> <+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846604> Hit: Returning 40079ec0 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627454> Hit: Returning 40079f18 -> < N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresentação e dúvida (80), 231703739> Hit: Returning 40079f70 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630691> Hit: Returning 40079fc8 -> <+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105735> Hit: Returning 4007a020 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004635> Hit: Returning 4007a078 -> < D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677285> Hit: Returning 4007a0d0 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21551069> Hit: Returning 4007a128 -> <+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103862635> Hit: Returning 4007a180 -> < D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713930> Hit: Returning 4007a1d8 -> <+ D 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876713> === format_index_line(33,1442) === Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:49:39 -0700 (PDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0 Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:6 min:49 sec:39 comatose(8003) returns:"8,003" INDEX(4007a230) -->+ 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out<-- (80), 224804841> Hit: Returning 4007a288 -> <+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679747> Hit: Returning 4007a2e0 -> < N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852306> Hit: Returning 4007a338 -> <+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Periódico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007874> Hit: Returning 4007a390 -> < N 37 Oct 10 Ronlaporte@aol.com (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080536> Hit: Returning 4007a3e8 -> <+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994859> 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < FldrList 13 3 > [ViewMsg] 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 13 RETURN Read command returning: 13 RETURN New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((505)ù) - ----- MAIL VIEW ----- busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Multipart/MIXED) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist comatose(9) returns:"9" - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Multipart/REPORT) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist comatose(10) returns:"10" - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Message/DELIVERY-STATUS) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist - mailcap_can_display - - mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) - - mc_init - mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist comatose(147) returns:"147" suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm suspend_busy_alarm resume_busy_alarm done. -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset line_test -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset line_test -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset line_test -- gf_pipe: done. -- gf_reset local_nvtnl -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0) -- gf_reset escape -- gf_reset wrap -- gf_reset nvtnl_local -- gf_pipe: done. cancel_busy_alarm(-1) @@@@ current:33 set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 207 comatose(33) returns:"33" comatose(1474) returns:"1,474" 0 ? Help 0 1 O OTHER CMDS 0 2 < MsgIndex 13 3 > ViewAttch 13 4 P PrevMsg 26 5 N NextMsg 26 6 - PrevPage 42 7 Spc NextPage 40 8 D Delete 53 9 U Undelete 53 10 R Reply 66 11 F Forward 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 new mail called (0 0 1) - adrbk_maintenance - check_point(GoodTime) ******** new mail returning -1 ******** Clearing status line STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) Read char returning: 113 q Read command returning: 113 q New_mail_count zeroed - process_cmd((501)õ) - MAIL_CMD: quit PROCESS_CMD return: 0 cancel_busy_alarm(-1) ---- QUIT SCREEN ---- suspend_busy_alarm 0 Y [Yes] 0 1 N No 0 2 (null) (null) 13 3 (null) (null) 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 121 y Want_to read: y (121) resume_busy_alarm - completely_done_with_adrbks - - init_abook - addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want TotallyClosed - adrbk_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) - - clear_entryref_cache - expunge and close mail stream "/var/mail/abel" q_status_message(Closing "INBOX"...) output_message(Closing "INBOX"...) suspend_busy_alarm d_q_status_message(Closing "INBOX"...) 0 Y [Yes] 0 1 N No 0 2 (null) (null) 13 3 (null) (null) 13 4 (null) (null) 26 5 (null) (null) 26 6 (null) (null) 40 7 (null) (null) 40 8 (null) (null) 53 9 (null) (null) 53 10 (null) (null) 66 11 (null) (null) 66 row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0 Read char returning: 121 y Want_to read: y (121) resume_busy_alarm comatose(1467) returns:"1,467" Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443) mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443) mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443) mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443) mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443) mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443) mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443) === mm_exists(1467,/var/mail/abel) called === Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel IMAP 18:11:39 10/10 mm_log babble: Expunged 7 messages pine_close_stream: closing "/var/mail/abel" end_screen called about to end_tty_driver end_signals(0) --------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54-- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Oct 11 04:55:54 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA06760; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA27805; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:55:51 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA07037; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:54:50 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA124176 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:52:57 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA16136 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:52:56 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:57:35 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:42:38 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:42:17 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: command line patch - outgoing.patch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My directory structure is ../../tmp/pine4.21/pine... I have an executable called pine in the pine directory under pine4.21 If I place the command line patch (outgoing.patch) in the pine4.21 director= y it fails for all hunks. I do not understand the first line of the patch: diff -rc pine4.21/pico/pico.c pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c I can run the patch command from the ../tmp directory and it will locate pi= ne4.21/pico/pico.c, but not pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c Where am I going wrong? ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Wed Oct 11 09:17:04 2000 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA22661; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA01678; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:17:02 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA14188; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:15:56 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA119290 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:12:51 -0700 Received: from pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.5.19]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA23813 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:12:48 -0700 Received: from gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.98.19]) by pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9BGClq22439 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:12:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (maldridg@localhost) by gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA50572 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:12:47 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:12:46 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Lea To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: "review recent ..." In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: maldridg@gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I accidentally stumbled on a useful feature of Pine, and have now made it happen twice. Problem is, I have no idea how I'm doing it, and couldn't find anything specific in the Pine info pages on the web. Both times that it's happened I've been in my INBOX folder and meaning to exit to the Main menu, I hit some combination of keys that produced a screen titled 'review recent messages'. The screen showed a summary of how many messages were marked deleted, new messages that had arrived, and other useful information - a summary of activity for that particular Pine session. How do I reproduce this? I'd like to use it as a tool. Lea -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA16471; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA02786; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:26 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA14680; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:51:40 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA25898 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:49:42 -0700 Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA22288 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:49:42 -0700 Received: from pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.5.19]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA18370 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:49:41 -0700 Received: from gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.98.19]) by pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9BGnUq12342 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:49:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (maldridg@localhost) by gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA37324 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:49:30 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:49:30 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Lea To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: "review recent ..." In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Information List X-Sender: maldridg@gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN With many thanks to Mohit Agarwal, I have an answer. What I was looking for was the 'Journal' feature. Pressing J while in Pine's Main menu activates it. Lea From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA28835; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA24345; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:47:26 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA25771; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:46:28 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA150762 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:44:44 -0700 Received: from bom2.vsnl.net.in (bom2.vsnl.net.in [202.54.1.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA26284 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:44:42 -0700 Received: from hal9k.myip.org (unknown [203.197.59.121]) by bom2.vsnl.net.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8AD442E for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 01:14:35 +0530 (GMT+5:30) Received: from localhost (IDENT:satyap@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hal9k.myip.org (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA03474 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:13:21 +0530 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:13:21 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Satya To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: "review recent ..." In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: satyap@hal9k.myip.org X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Oct 11, 2000 at 10:49, Lea wrote: >With many thanks to Mohit Agarwal, I have an answer. What I was looking >for was the 'Journal' feature. Pressing J while in Pine's Main menu >activates it. Wow, I never noticed. This is cool. Note that these are in fact all the status line messages! -- Satya. US-bound grad students! For pre-apps, see "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magnetic tape." -- Andrew Tanenbaum From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA04955; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA27640; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:43:14 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA02244; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:42:16 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA161610 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:40:24 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA10694 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:40:23 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:56:28 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:41:36 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:41:24 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: patch failing Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I reduced the command line patch to the first hunk (removing the diff -rc l= ine) as follows: *** pine4.21/pico/pico.c Thu Jun 10 15:56:16 1999=20 --- pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c Thu Feb 24 02:29:09 2000 ***********= **** *** 133,138 ****=20 ---- 133,143 ----=20 pico_all_done =3D 0; km_popped =3D 0; = =20 + if (pm->auto_cmds){=20 + #define CTRL_X 24=20 + if ((pm->auto_cmds[0] =3D=3D CTRL_X) && (pm->auto_cmds[1] =3D=3D 'y')= ){ + return (1);}}=20 + =20 if(!vtinit()) /* Init Displays. */ return(COMP_CANCEL); P_CANCEL);=20 My understanding is that this should insert those lines starting with a "+"= into .../pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c My output reads as follows: Processing... Looks like a context diff...=20 The text leading up to this was: --------------------------=20 |*** pine4.21/pico/pico.c Thu Jun 10 15:56:16 1999 |--- pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c Thu Feb 24 02:29:09 2000 ---------= -----------------=20 Patching file pine4.21/pico/pico.c using Plan A... patch: = 3016-030 (This is really a new-style context diff but without the telltale = extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate the new style...) Hunk #1 failed at 133. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to pine4.21/pico/pico.c.rej done =20 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA10393; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA13152; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:05:21 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA12904; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:04:23 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA41634 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:02:01 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA20297 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:01:59 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:18:01 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:03:07 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:02:42 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: patch failing - resolved Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My patch file had ^M at end of every line, may have been result of download= ... ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA24953; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA26073; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:09:09 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA01310; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:07:19 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA164004 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:04:45 -0700 Received: from alfred.cc.uottawa.ca (alfred.cc.uottawa.ca [137.122.6.40]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA28266 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:04:44 -0700 Received: from fatherubu.cc.uottawa.ca (fatherubu.cc.uottawa.ca [137.122.170.100]) by alfred.cc.uottawa.ca (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA06786 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:04:43 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:04:43 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paul Deveau To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine freezes when sending MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: pdeveau@cliff.uottawa.ca X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi: I recently upgraded an RS/6000 from AIX 4.1 to 4.2.1. Since then Pine has not been able to send e-mail. After composing a note and pressing Ctrl-X to send it Pine kind of locks up with the message "Sending mail/" in the bottom. I grabbed the latest AIX binary from the Pine FTP site, and copied over a binary that works on another system, but to no avail. Any ideas? Thanks. Paul Deveau Centrale des ordinateurs - Computer Centre 562-5800 x3774 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA16849; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu (root@lists3.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.3]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA19136; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:46:17 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA25082; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:45:14 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA212508 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:44:24 -0700 Received: from tunku.uady.mx (tunku.uady.mx [148.209.1.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA30433 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:44:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (angel@localhost) by tunku.uady.mx (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9DClnI13043; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:47:51 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:47:49 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: again please In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Paul Deveau X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Well, I have a problem with PINE. This odnt delete messages when a user has marked messages and quit...when the user comeback and have a new session with pine, the messages marked "deleted" there are here, dou you know this problem in the server with pine? Please send your comments because now a lot users have this problem. Greetings from Mayan World ************************************ | Q.B.B.ANGEL G. POLANCO RODRIGUEZ | | UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE YUCATAN | | DIRECCION GENERAL DE | | DESARROLLO ACADEMICO | | DEPARTAMENTO DE TELEINFORMATICA| | CALLE 59 POR AV. ITZAEZ # 490 | | MERIDA, YUCATAN, MEXICO | | CODIGO POSTAL : 97 000 | | TELEFONO:52 (99) 23 74 28 | | E-mail: angel@tunku.uady.mx | ************************************ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA12884; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu (root@lists5.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.6]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA23526; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:50:34 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA04861; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:48:57 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA54590 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:48:10 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA158268; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:47:52 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: again please In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez wrote: > Well, I have a problem with PINE. This odnt delete messages when a user > has marked messages and quit...when the user comeback and have a new > session with pine, the messages marked "deleted" there are here, dou you > know this problem in the server with pine? What happens when they push X to expunge the messages manually? If that works, you might want to check in Main, Setup, Config to see which of the following options are set. (This is how mine are, for reference.) [ ] expunge-only-manually [X] expunge-without-confirm [X] expunge-without-confirm-everywhere -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA26647; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu (root@lists4.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA25198; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:39:23 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA17684; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:37:54 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA161166 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:37:03 -0700 Received: from tunku.uady.mx (tunku.uady.mx [148.209.1.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA27922; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:36:45 -0700 Received: from localhost (angel@localhost) by tunku.uady.mx (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9DGeFH26661; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:40:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:40:15 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: again please In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN OK Scott, thanks by your tip. ************************************ | Q.B.B.ANGEL G. POLANCO RODRIGUEZ | | UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE YUCATAN | | DIRECCION GENERAL DE | | DESARROLLO ACADEMICO | | DEPARTAMENTO DE TELEINFORMATICA| | CALLE 59 POR AV. ITZAEZ # 490 | | MERIDA, YUCATAN, MEXICO | | CODIGO POSTAL : 97 000 | | TELEFONO:52 (99) 23 74 28 | | E-mail: angel@tunku.uady.mx | ************************************ On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez wrote: > > > Well, I have a problem with PINE. This odnt delete messages when a user > > has marked messages and quit...when the user comeback and have a new > > session with pine, the messages marked "deleted" there are here, dou you > > know this problem in the server with pine? > > What happens when they push X to expunge the messages manually? If that > works, you might want to check in Main, Setup, Config to see which of the > following options are set. (This is how mine are, for reference.) > > [ ] expunge-only-manually > [X] expunge-without-confirm > [X] expunge-without-confirm-everywhere > > > -- > Scott Leibrand > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA29880; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA16135; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:51:58 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA19238; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:48:14 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA159868 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:41:37 -0700 Received: from niwot.scd.ucar.edu (niwot.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.223]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA06817 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:41:37 -0700 Received: from sedona.scd.ucar.edu (sedona.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.183]) by niwot.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA27653 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:41:33 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (era@localhost) by sedona.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13715 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:41:33 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:41:33 -0600 (MDT) Reply-To: era@ucar.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ed Arnold To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine 4.30 availability? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: sedona.scd.ucar.edu: era owned process doing -bs X-Sender: era@sedona.scd.ucar.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Anyone know the approx. schedule as to when pine 4.30 will be generally available? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA01843; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA21363; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:33:35 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA22236; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:32:08 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA40012 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:22:42 -0700 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org (root@vger.timpanogas.org [207.109.151.240]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA03287 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:22:41 -0700 Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (HSE-MTL-ppp11844.qc.sympatico.ca [209.226.179.170]) by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01035 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:19:52 -0600 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA12477 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:22:32 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:22:31 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE format string vulnerabilities MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs X-Sender: mharris@asdf.capslock.lan X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Recently on BUGTRAQ someone posted a security audit on PINE showing that it had over 4000 format string vulnerabilities. Being an avid PINE user, I was shocked. I do not know the legitimacy of this claim yet, however I wanted to ask here to get the official response. It was suggested on BUGTRAQ that it would be worthless to try and fix PINE with that many bugs. I disagree completely however as grep/sed/perl are our friends, and this is open source. Therefore, has the PINE team an official position on PINE format string vulnerabilities? Is anyone correcting any such bugs? Does the PINE team need help doing so? I would be interested in trying to help correct format string bugs if the effort wouldn't be duplicated, and I could be assigned certain portions of code to audit. Thanks in advance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "A Firewall is really much like a sophisticated traffic cop; it detects and stops unauthorized or suspicious movement in or out of the network. But security is more than a Firewall; it's a process. You can't just put in a Firewall and think you're secure." -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA21203; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA10668; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:03:04 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA16942; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:01:32 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA212550 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:59:39 -0700 Received: from students.uz.ac.zw (IDENT:agona@[196.4.80.241]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id DAA11581 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:59:34 -0700 Received: (qmail 7925 invoked by uid 1778); 14 Oct 2000 22:41:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Oct 2000 22:41:02 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:41:02 +0200 (CAT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: jeps@students.uz.ac.zw To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: History & .profile MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN For what purpose do i have .profile file in my home directory? Also when i enter history at my prompt i get a listing of ALL the commands that i made and these number into the thousands, how can i tell my server to lose the last say 10 commands when i logout. bye ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mutumwa Jepson Rushwaya |THE WORST FORM OF VERBAL ABUSE IS TO jeps@students.uz.ac.zw |IGNORE SOMEONE. | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA23254; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA10969; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:16:59 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA38268; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:15:53 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA195370 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:14:27 -0700 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org (root@vger.timpanogas.org [207.109.151.240]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA16666 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:14:27 -0700 Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (ppp4002.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.218.162]) by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA08060; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 05:09:07 -0600 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA02301; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:11:27 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:11:27 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: History & .profile In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: jeps@students.uz.ac.zw X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs X-Sender: mharris@asdf.capslock.lan X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 jeps@students.uz.ac.zw wrote: >Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:41:02 +0200 (CAT) >From: jeps@students.uz.ac.zw >To: Pine Discussion Forum >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Subject: History & .profile > >For what purpose do i have .profile file in my home directory? > >Also when i enter history at my prompt i get a listing >of ALL the commands that i made and these number into the thousands, how >can i tell my server to lose the last say 10 commands when i logout. Neither question has anything whatsoever to do with PINE at all. The answer however: man bash man csh HISTSIZE=10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ---------------------------------------------------------------------- #[Mike A. Harris bash tip #3 - how to disable core dumps] # Put the following at the bottom of your ~/.bash_profile ulimit -c 0 From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id AAA02200; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA31724; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:30:19 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id AAA22234; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:28:47 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA186376 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:52 -0700 Received: from web5105.mail.yahoo.com (web5105.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.106.75]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id AAA22704 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:52 -0700 Received: from [206.124.10.151] by web5105.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:48 PDT Message-Id: <20001016072648.16495.qmail@web5105.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Banananose Maldonado To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine4.21, ssl connection to imap server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi all- I have a server running imaps with Openssl 0.9.6 on port 993, which is serving its Netscape clients properly. It has a self-signed certificate. To set up Pine on my local host (Solaris 7) to run a secure connection to this server, I have a line like this in my .pinerc: inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl}INBOX This doesn't work... I just get "opening inbox" and a spinning bar forever. Pine was compiled with the ssl patch. The last few lines of my .pine-debug after running "pine -d9" are: 21:39:24.347168 About to open folder "INBOX" inbox: "INBOX" 21:39:24.347883 busy_alarm(1, Opening "INBOX", 0, 1) 21:39:24.348688 q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" ) 21:39:24.349268 output_message(Opening "INBOX" ) 21:39:24.351257 STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 21:39:24.363004 IMAP 21:39:24 10/15 mm_log babble: Trying IP address [10.3.0.20] 21:39:25.350137 alarm_signal() ... The alarm signal repeats over and over... what am I missing? Do I something akin to a "novalidate-cert" switch on the inbox-path line? If I try this line: inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl/novalidate-cert}INBOX I get the "Can't open inbox invalid remote specification" message. Any help will be greatly appreciated... Thanks Mucho, =Barry= __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA24726; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA00586; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:27:15 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA17284; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:25:42 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA160300 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:23:51 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA13100 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:23:50 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18990 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:23:49 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a solution. Any ideas? Can anyone confirm this for me? Thanks, Robert ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA27217; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA17706; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:20:40 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA34166; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:19:22 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA159764 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:29 -0700 Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA01841 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:28 -0700 Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64]) by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA124610 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:15:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost) by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA66376 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:15:25 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:15:25 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ashawley@gnu.uvm.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? aaron On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > solution. Any ideas? > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > Thanks, > > Robert From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA24754; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA17825; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:48 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA34280; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:02 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA179532 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:17:59 -0700 Received: from cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (IDENT:root@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.73.78]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA24911 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:17:55 -0700 Received: from localhost (mohit@localhost) by cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9GINEP08852 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:53:14 +0530 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:53:13 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mohit Agarwal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Deleting attachments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello: I wasn't quite able to figure out how to delete a attachment from a mail without deleting the mail itself. Any help! Regards, Mohit -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA18677; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA03273; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:57 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA30822; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:32:16 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA131358 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:28:44 -0700 Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA10618 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:28:43 -0700 Received: from elk.uvm.edu (elk.uvm.edu [132.198.101.63]) by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA57762 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost) by elk.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA46514 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:41 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:41 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Deleting attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: elk.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ashawley@elk.uvm.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/attachments.html#7.6 On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Mohit Agarwal wrote: > Hello: > > I wasn't quite able to figure out how to delete a attachment from a mail > without deleting the mail itself. Any help! > > Regards, > Mohit From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA19898; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18255; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:47 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA18730; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:34:39 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA52596 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:28 -0700 Received: from evtvir02.tc.fluke.com (mail.fluke.com [206.138.179.200]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA10945 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:27 -0700 Received: from evtvir02.tc.fluke.com ([129.196.184.22]) by evtvir02.tc.fluke.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 4Z3CVA2N; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:27:41 -0700 Received: FROM dd BY evtvir02.tc.fluke.com ; Mon Oct 16 11:27:40 2000 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Dyck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Deleting attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mohit Agarwal X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Mohit Agarwal wrote: > I wasn't quite able to figure out how to delete a attachment from a mail > without deleting the mail itself. Any help! What I do is 'v'iew the message to get to the ATTACHMENT INDEX, type D to delete the attachment, then save the whole message to the same folder (INBOX). I get prompted that the save won't save the attachment, and after the new attachment-less message appears in the folder, I expunge the original Does this help? (maybe there is a better way) From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA07044; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18312; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:19 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA23948; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:53 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA111102 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:31:21 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA05534 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:31:20 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20649; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:36:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:47 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would limit access to sent-mail when on the road. Does that help? RCL On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > aaron > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA32678; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18315; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:48 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA18772; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:04 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA31876 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:54 -0700 Received: from cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (IDENT:root@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.73.78]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA28400 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (mohit@localhost) by cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9GId2s08974; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:09:02 +0530 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:09:02 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mohit Agarwal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Deleting attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: David Dyck X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I forgot to mention in the previous mail -- I'm aware that the messages having attachments can be _saved_ to some folder (even the same folder!). But I wanted to know whether there's a better way out. On 2000-10-16, at 11:30 -0700, David Dyck wrote: DD> DD> What I do is 'v'iew the message to get to DD> the ATTACHMENT INDEX, DD> type D to delete the attachment, DD> then save the whole message to the DD> same folder (INBOX). I get prompted DD> that the save won't save the attachment, DD> and after the new attachment-less message DD> appears in the folder, I expunge the DD> original DD> DD> Does this help? DD> (maybe there is a better way) DD> From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA08940; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA19573; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:15:33 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA41438; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:14:46 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA185458 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:13:50 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA145482; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:13:30 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Deleting attachments In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mohit Agarwal X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Mohit Agarwal wrote: > I forgot to mention in the previous mail -- I'm aware that the messages having > attachments can be _saved_ to some folder (even the same folder!). But I > wanted to know whether there's a better way out. That's the only way to do it within Pine. If you want you could also try editting the mail folder file yourself (or writing a script to do it), but you'll want to make backups first. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA00262; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA20749; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:56:47 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA22522; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:55:22 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA216596 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:53:02 -0700 Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA31357 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:53:00 -0700 Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64]) by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA66950 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:52:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost) by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA135470 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:52:55 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:52:54 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ashawley@gnu.uvm.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN it does help. there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup [C]onfig? On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > Does that help? > > RCL > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > aaron > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Robert From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA01422; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA06223; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:12:09 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA20698; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:10:32 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA158856 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:09:01 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01995 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:09:00 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22536; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:08:43 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN no value set On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > it does help. > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > [C]onfig? > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > Does that help? > > > > RCL > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Robert > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA10484; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA21409; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:18:09 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37828; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:16:40 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA100730 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:15:54 -0700 Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA18279 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:15:52 -0700 Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64]) by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25104 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:15:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost) by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA100904 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:15:50 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:15:50 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ashawley@gnu.uvm.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN is a good sign. check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: last-time-prune-questioned= On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > no value set > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > it does help. > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > [C]onfig? > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Robert From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA01721; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA06547; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:34 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA19252; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:21:33 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA135042 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:20:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA209928 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:20:29 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The proper value for last-time-prune-questioned is 100.10 (that's 100 years and 10 months since 1900). If the value is higher, set it to 100.10 or 100.9 (if you want to prune immediately instead of next month). -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > is a good sign. > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: > > last-time-prune-questioned= > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > no value set > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > it does help. > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > > [C]onfig? > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA03761; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA21572; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:50 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA25274; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:04 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA202960 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:20 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01321 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:09 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22991; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:21:51 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN it says 100.10. On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > is a good sign. > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: > > last-time-prune-questioned= > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > no value set > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > it does help. > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > > [C]onfig? > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA03837; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA06972; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:39:06 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA16316; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:36:33 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA185476 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:35:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA145628; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:34:51 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Robert Larmon X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I think the next step, then, is to do the following: - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9 - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9) - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file. Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able to prune your sent-mail folder. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > it says 100.10. > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > is a good sign. > > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: > > > > last-time-prune-questioned= > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > no value set > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > it does help. > > > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > > > [C]onfig? > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > ` Robert Larmon ` > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA06681; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA22811; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:04:11 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA22290; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:03:06 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA163958 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:02:19 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA03641; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:02:19 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23806; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:02:13 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question... 13:47:02 ==== expire_mail called ==== 13:47:02 Current month 24009 13:47:02 ---- write_pinerc ---- 13:47:02 write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224 This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular 4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine debug file? Thanks, Robert On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > I think the next step, then, is to do the following: > > - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9 > - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9) > - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file. > Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able > to prune your sent-mail folder. > > -- > Scott Leibrand > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > it says 100.10. > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > is a good sign. > > > > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: > > > > > > last-time-prune-questioned= > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > no value set > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > it does help. > > > > > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > > > > [C]onfig? > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > ` Robert Larmon ` > > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA24925; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA08871; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:40 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA16614; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:29:26 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA205330 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:37 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA224620; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:04 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Robert Larmon X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm not sure what the 24009 means, but it could mean your system's date is wrong. Check to make sure it's still October 2000. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question... > > 13:47:02 > ==== expire_mail called ==== > > 13:47:02 > Current month 24009 > > 13:47:02 > ---- write_pinerc ---- > > 13:47:02 > write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224 > > > This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still > don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now > to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular > 4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine > debug file? > > Thanks, > > Robert > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > I think the next step, then, is to do the following: > > > > - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9 > > - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9) > > - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file. > > Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able > > to prune your sent-mail folder. > > > > -- > > Scott Leibrand > > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > it says 100.10. > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > is a good sign. > > > > > > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: > > > > > > > > last-time-prune-questioned= > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > no value set > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > it does help. > > > > > > > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > > > > > [C]onfig? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > > ` Robert Larmon ` > > > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > > > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > > > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > > > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > ` Robert Larmon ` > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA26164; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA08954; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:59 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA42410; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:31:31 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA161596 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:49 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA15670; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:48 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24355; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:41 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches except IE 5.5) On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > I'm not sure what the 24009 means, but it could mean your system's date is > wrong. Check to make sure it's still October 2000. > > -- > Scott Leibrand > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question... > > > > 13:47:02 > > ==== expire_mail called ==== > > > > 13:47:02 > > Current month 24009 > > > > 13:47:02 > > ---- write_pinerc ---- > > > > 13:47:02 > > write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224 > > > > > > This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still > > don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now > > to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular > > 4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine > > debug file? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > I think the next step, then, is to do the following: > > > > > > - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9 > > > - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9) > > > - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file. > > > Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able > > > to prune your sent-mail folder. > > > > > > -- > > > Scott Leibrand > > > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > > > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > > > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > > > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > > > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > it says 100.10. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > > > is a good sign. > > > > > > > > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: > > > > > > > > > > last-time-prune-questioned= > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > no value set > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > it does help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > > > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > > > > > > [C]onfig? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > > > ` Robert Larmon ` > > > > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > > > > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > > > > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > > > > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > ` Robert Larmon ` > > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA00304; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA08995; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:34:00 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA42016; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:33:20 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA158954 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA219734; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:23 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Robert Larmon X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches > except IE 5.5) From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA14450; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA24224; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:40:06 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA40458; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:39:13 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA111072 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:38:25 -0700 Received: from localhost.edlund.org (m96.ryd.student.liu.se [130.236.214.96]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA11598 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:38:24 -0700 Received: by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id C945241052; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:38:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C274741051; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:38:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:38:19 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Robert Larmon X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN 24009 months equals the number of months from 0000-00-00 until 2000-09-30. On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches > except IE 5.5) > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > I'm not sure what the 24009 means, but it could mean your system's date is > > wrong. Check to make sure it's still October 2000. > > > > -- > > Scott Leibrand > > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question... > > > > > > 13:47:02 > > > ==== expire_mail called ==== > > > > > > 13:47:02 > > > Current month 24009 > > > > > > 13:47:02 > > > ---- write_pinerc ---- > > > > > > 13:47:02 > > > write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224 > > > > > > > > > This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still > > > don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now > > > to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular > > > 4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine > > > debug file? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > > > > > I think the next step, then, is to do the following: > > > > > > > > - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9 > > > > - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9) > > > > - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file. > > > > Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able > > > > to prune your sent-mail folder. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Scott Leibrand > > > > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > > > > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > > > > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > > > > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > > > > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it says 100.10. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > is a good sign. > > > > > > > > > > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says: > > > > > > > > > > > > last-time-prune-questioned= > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > no value set > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > > it does help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your > > > > > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup > > > > > > > > [C]onfig? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail > > > > > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection > > > > > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would > > > > > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RCL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your > > > > > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aaron > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the > > > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old > > > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine > > > > > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a > > > > > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > > > > ` Robert Larmon ` > > > > > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > > > > > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > > > > > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > > > > > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > > ` Robert Larmon ` > > > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > > > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > > > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > > > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > ` Robert Larmon ` > ` PC Systems Analyst ` > ` USC Law School Computing Services ` > ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' > > -- Henrik Edlund (HE2914-RIPE) http://www.edlund.org/ "You're full of shit, you know that? There's a toilet over there." -- Yuen (Tequila), "Lashou shentan" ("Hard-Boiled") From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA27454; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA09649; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:16 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA24040; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:49:24 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA52594 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:48:35 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA13776 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:48:35 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24849 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:48:25 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Just one more thing, typing in sent-mail in the pruned folder list does work in PC-Pine, although I don't think that's how it's meant to work. Unless anyone has any other insight, should this be submitted as a bug? RCL On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn. > > -- > Scott Leibrand > leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote: > > > > > Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches > > except IE 5.5) > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA31181; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA24659; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:51:15 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA23812; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:24 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA79026 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:49:17 -0700 Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA19803 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:49:15 -0700 Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64]) by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA110134 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:49:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost) by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA185890 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:49:04 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:49:04 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ashawley@gnu.uvm.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN back to the folder collections strategy: how many folder collections do you have? aaron On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA09422; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA25117; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:02:08 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA26836; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:01:20 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA172992 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:59:23 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA07445 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:59:22 -0700 Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25120; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:05:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:59:10 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have an incoming folder collection and a saved mail folder collection. I just started a third collection this month (local), so that should have no bearing on the case. The inbox is separated from the saved mail folders. RCL On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > back to the folder collections strategy: > > how many folder collections do you have? > > aaron > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn. > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA13166; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA13559; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:02:05 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA36548; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:01:16 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA212552 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:59:15 -0700 Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA27591 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:59:14 -0700 Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:12:01 +0100 Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:57:28 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:57:17 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bridget Nichols" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: addressee taken from file Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is it possible to use pine from the command line with the addressee's name = in a text file as follows: pine -I^X,y -subject "hello" < ban where the file ban contains the addressee name bnichols@hhnt.org?=20 This does not work as I have written above either with < or <<... ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20 your email system administrator. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA13368; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA15064; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:03:06 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA15754; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:02:03 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA111008 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:59:15 -0700 Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA18165 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:59:15 -0700 Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id KAA08537 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:59:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:59:10 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Peterson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: HTML mode MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: pete@gort.office.aol.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the Content-Type header is usually missing. Pine sees this as plain text (as it should) and displays the entire message including all the HTML tags. I realize this is the correct approach, but it isn't really the friendly approach. I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as such? Or, maybe there's a command I'm missing, similar to the "h" (view headers) toggle. That would force the page to be viewed as HTML even if the Content-Type is missing or not "text/html"? -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Peterson (dbpete@aol.com) - AOL, Dulles, VA 703-265-0226 --------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA22378; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA08201; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:57:50 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA24566; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:56:26 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA99460 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:53:34 -0700 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org (root@vger.timpanogas.org [207.109.151.240]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA23359 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:53:33 -0700 Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (ppp5086.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.218.224]) by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03591; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:49:41 -0600 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01453; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:52:13 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:52:12 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: HTML mode In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dan Peterson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs X-Sender: mharris@asdf.capslock.lan X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote: >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:59:10 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) >From: Dan Peterson >To: Pine Discussion Forum >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Subject: HTML mode > >I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client >neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the >Content-Type header is usually missing. > >Pine sees this as plain text (as it should) and displays the entire >message including all the HTML tags. I realize this is the correct >approach, but it isn't really the friendly approach. > >I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get >pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as >such? > >Or, maybe there's a command I'm missing, similar to the "h" (view headers) >toggle. That would force the page to be viewed as HTML even if the >Content-Type is missing or not "text/html"? You could use "procmail" to preprocess messages. You'd need a procmail recipe that detects an all-HTML message body with no content header, it then would add the header for you. I have no idea an exact procmail recipe to do this, but some piping through the unix "file" command might determine if it is HTML or not, for messages lacking a content type header. This would be a better question on the procmail mailing list. Someone would probably write it for you too. Good luck, TTYL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [Quote: Linus Torvalds - Aug 27, 2000 - linux-kernel mailing list] "And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more right than I usually am." -- Linus Torvalds From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA13512; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA08828; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:17:46 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA13914; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:16:08 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA163426 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:55 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA27973 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:55 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA420921; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: HTML mode In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dan Peterson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Dan Peterson (pete@aol.net) wrote today: :) I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client :) neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the :) Content-Type header is usually missing. :) :) I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get :) pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as :) such? Hello Dan, Something you can try to see how it works for you is to use "display-filters". You can make some educated guesses like "if the first string of a line is , then the message is a message in text/html format". Of course the guess can be incorrect, but it works most of the times. All you would need to do is add the following text to your sending-filters configuration option: _BEGINNING()_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_ and after that _BEGINNING()_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_ That will take care of most of the messages. Now, about the disadvantages of this method. - The filter will be activated when you intend to reply the message, that is to say, you'll run lynx when you want to reply to the message. - If a message is not in text/html format it will still be processed by lynx if the filter is activated and the output may look ugly. In any case above, after quitting lynx you'll see the unprocessed message, so you won't lose anything and may have gained something. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA14757; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA20982; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:17:13 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA13350; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:16:21 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA79008 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:14:05 -0700 Received: from niwot.scd.ucar.edu (niwot.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.223]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA02138 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:14:05 -0700 Received: from sedona.scd.ucar.edu (sedona.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.183]) by niwot.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA15978; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:14:01 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (era@localhost) by sedona.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08066; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:14:00 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:14:00 -0600 (MDT) Reply-To: era@ucar.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ed Arnold To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: HTML mode In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dan Peterson X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Authentication-Warning: sedona.scd.ucar.edu: era owned process doing -bs X-Sender: era@sedona.scd.ucar.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote: > I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client > neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the > Content-Type header is usually missing. > > Pine sees this as plain text (as it should) and displays the entire > message including all the HTML tags. I realize this is the correct > approach, but it isn't really the friendly approach. > > I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get > pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as > such? I have an associated question about this I've asked before but not gotten an answer to, thought I'd try again in case someone has an answer. Even when there is a correct "Content-Type: text/html", I find that netscape (specifically netscape-4.6) refuses to display an HTML attachment because the temp file which pine saves does not have a suffix of ".html". When pine sees the following .mailcap entry (this on unix): text/html; netscape %s; description="HTML" ... it saves the text/html attachment as a pseudo-random filename (in /var/tmp, as I recall) which does not have ".html" on the end, then hands that off to netscape. Consequently netscape can't determine that the file is HTML. Anyone know a way around this? From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA10309; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA15893; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:39 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA34694; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:45:33 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA111858 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:43:14 -0700 Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA13517 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:43:13 -0700 Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51]) by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B45110681; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:43:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:41:53 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "John Lange" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Mike A. Harris" , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list on this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a pine development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this list. Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore? John Lange -----Original Message----- From: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu]On Behalf Of Mike A. Harris Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 5:23 PM To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE format string vulnerabilities Recently on BUGTRAQ someone posted a security audit on PINE showing that it had over 4000 format string vulnerabilities. Being an avid PINE user, I was shocked. I do not know the legitimacy of this claim yet, however I wanted to ask here to get the official response. It was suggested on BUGTRAQ that it would be worthless to try and fix PINE with that many bugs. I disagree completely however as grep/sed/perl are our friends, and this is open source. Therefore, has the PINE team an official position on PINE format string vulnerabilities? Is anyone correcting any such bugs? Does the PINE team need help doing so? I would be interested in trying to help correct format string bugs if the effort wouldn't be duplicated, and I could be assigned certain portions of code to audit. Thanks in advance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "A Firewall is really much like a sophisticated traffic cop; it detects and stops unauthorized or suspicious movement in or out of the network. But security is more than a Firewall; it's a process. You can't just put in a Firewall and think you're secure." -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA11058; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA15933; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:47:37 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA15140; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:48 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA55038 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:44:22 -0700 Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA28262 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:44:21 -0700 Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51]) by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 98BF510681; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:44:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:43:01 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "John Lange" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: pine4.21, ssl connection to imap server In-Reply-To: <20001016072648.16495.qmail@web5105.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Banananose Maldonado" , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I can't help you with pine and SSL, but I can give you a work around. The most recent version of fetchmail will work perfectly with SSL. So you can pull your mail in local and then read it with Pine. John Lange -----Original Message----- From: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu]On Behalf Of Banananose Maldonado Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 2:27 AM To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine4.21, ssl connection to imap server Hi all- I have a server running imaps with Openssl 0.9.6 on port 993, which is serving its Netscape clients properly. It has a self-signed certificate. To set up Pine on my local host (Solaris 7) to run a secure connection to this server, I have a line like this in my .pinerc: inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl}INBOX This doesn't work... I just get "opening inbox" and a spinning bar forever. Pine was compiled with the ssl patch. The last few lines of my .pine-debug after running "pine -d9" are: 21:39:24.347168 About to open folder "INBOX" inbox: "INBOX" 21:39:24.347883 busy_alarm(1, Opening "INBOX", 0, 1) 21:39:24.348688 q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" ) 21:39:24.349268 output_message(Opening "INBOX" ) 21:39:24.351257 STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0 21:39:24.363004 IMAP 21:39:24 10/15 mm_log babble: Trying IP address [10.3.0.20] 21:39:25.350137 alarm_signal() ... The alarm signal repeats over and over... what am I missing? Do I something akin to a "novalidate-cert" switch on the inbox-path line? If I try this line: inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl/novalidate-cert}INBOX I get the "Can't open inbox invalid remote specification" message. Any help will be greatly appreciated... Thanks Mucho, =Barry= __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA19788; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA16112; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:54:30 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA44938; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:53:47 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA221494 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:52:00 -0700 Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA07922 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:51:55 -0700 Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64]) by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA93304 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:51:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost) by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA41736 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:51:52 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:51:52 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ashawley@gnu.uvm.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote: > I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list > on this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a > pine development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this > list. > > Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering > if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore? from what i've observed, they try to spend their time developing rather than discussion on lists, or updating the web pages, unless a new version is released. they occasionally pop up in a newsgroup or in this list if people make enough inflammatory comments about their "lil' pride and joy" version 4.3x or something should be on the way. we might just have offline use (w/out hacking a pine config file). aaron From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA09938; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA00443; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:08:25 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA38470; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:07:36 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA131496 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:52:03 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA170026; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:51:59 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Disconnected support (was: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: > version 4.3x or something should be on the way. we might just have > offline use (w/out hacking a pine config file). No disconnected support this time around. They say the next release with new features should have it. Here's a pared-down excerpt of the release notes for pre-release 4, with my comments in parentheses: Major new additions include: * Configuration flexibility + pine configurations can now be stored remotely on an imap server for access from different locations without the need to configure for each location. + configuration may be split into two parts: generic configuration and exceptional, per-platform configuration. + signatures can now be stored remotely or as part of the pinerc file + for configuration options which are lists, inheritance is supported * New security features (SSL support, etc.) * Minor rule enhancements * Enhanced MAPI support for PC-Pine * Various other new features and configuration options * New command line options (for remote IMAP config file support) Someone please yell at me if I'm not supposed to be telling people all this. :) -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA01396; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA20943; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:16:55 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA32716; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:15:21 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA190402 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:23 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA04618 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:22 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA01613 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (postmast@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9IN3Ke20214 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:21 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: disable LDAP record view? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hey all -- Due to a complaint brought up by a student, we are trying to find a way to disable the full LDAP directory view in Pine and PC-Pine. The reason being is that our Dean of Student's is interperting FERPA to mean that we can not have the Student's ID number displayed anywere -- even if it is not convertable to a ID number usable anywhere else.. (it's not a disguised SSN). Before we get the lawywers involved to discussed the finer points of FERPA, is there anyway we disable this display? (Out of sight, out of mind.) Thanks, Steve. -- Steven Premeau, Network Manager premeau@uwp.edu (414) 595-2005 Networking and Microcomputing Services University of Wisconsin - Parkside ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "A car is more costly, complex, and dangerous than any word processor. Yet you don't find a thousand page operating manual, nor must you check with a friend to learn how to close the window ..." - Cliff Stoll in "Silicon Snake Oil" -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA02264; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA21066; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:08 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA44940; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:19:27 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA106270 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:18:01 -0700 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA29843 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:18:00 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA15644 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:18:00 -0700 Received: from localhost (postmast@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9INHxV21186 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:17:59 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Atle Weibell Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Atle Weibell To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: new error message ("mail not sent") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I've got a new error message: [Mail not sent. Sending error: 501 bogus mail from] This happened on a mail that was forwarded to my usual account from another account, and when I replied, my other address came up in a From: field in the top of the headers. Any suggestions? -- Atle Weibell | atle@weibell.no | pr 51690007 | mo 41310057 | fx 51690431 | -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA08644; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA03011; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:22:08 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA26224; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:21:24 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA130422 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:45 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA70144 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:44 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Disconnected support (was: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > No disconnected support this time around. They say the next release with > new features should have it. Clarification: That's when we (Pine power users like myself) HOPE it will be available. As usual, the Pine team (which doesn't include me) makes no promises about when new features like this one (which IS on the future-features list) might be added. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA14315; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA03290; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:30:05 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA23686; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:29:15 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA151562 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:23:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA162042; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:23:01 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: new error message ("mail not sent") In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Atle Weibell X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Atle Weibell wrote: > I've got a new error message: > > [Mail not sent. Sending error: 501 bogus mail from] > > This happened on a mail that was forwarded to my usual account from > another account, and when I replied, my other address came up in a From: > field in the top of the headers. Pine is passing on that message from your SMTP server or MTA. It sounds like it won't tolerate you changing your From: header. (I presume you did that on purpose...) Talk to your ISP to get the details and find out what you're allowed to do. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA12589; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA24843; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:52:28 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA42662; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:51:42 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA141942 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:50:50 -0700 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org (root@vger.timpanogas.org [207.109.151.240]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA32002 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:50:44 -0700 Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (SSMarie-ppp111156.sympatico.ca [216.209.120.55]) by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07521; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:47:37 -0600 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA08174; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:45:44 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:45:44 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs X-Sender: mharris@asdf.capslock.lan X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote: >> I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list >> on this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a >> pine development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this >> list. >> >> Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering >> if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore? > >from what i've observed, they try to spend their time developing rather >than discussion on lists, or updating the web pages, unless a new version >is released. they occasionally pop up in a newsgroup or in this list if >people make enough inflammatory comments about their "lil' pride and joy" Well, I am a complete total die hard PINE user, so.. ;o) I've got my complaints too, but _NOTHING_ will stop me from using PINE short of a bullet in the head. >version 4.3x or something should be on the way. we might just have >offline use (w/out hacking a pine config file). Cool, so the number of format string bugs will be even higher soon! I can't wait! ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Want to try a new high performance open source web server? Try Caudium! http://caudium.org http://caudium.sourceforge.net From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id TAA04128; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA07492; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:52 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id TAA36984; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:01 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA161032 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:43:19 -0700 Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA06352 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:43:18 -0700 Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.189]) by smtp.tznet.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 3462100; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:43:06 -0500 Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 28764B1; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:50:30 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <20001018215030.A748@tznet.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:50:30 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Michael Urban To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Fix for buffer overflows in From field? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm sorry to ask a question that has most likely already been asked before (although I could not find anything regarding this in either the archives or on the pine website), but does anyone know if there is a fix in the works for the buffer overflow vulnerability in the >From field? I've always prefered using Pine, but I learned about this security hole when trying to install tha latest Pine port on my FreeBSD system and finding the port marked "FORBIDDEN". After this, I read more about it on BUGTRAQ. I guess I have two questions: #1: Is there a fix? #2: Is this problem serious enough to stop using Pine? Right now, just to be safe, I am using Mutt, although I much prefer Pine. Thanks for any info. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA14013; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA26575; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:23:28 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id UAA40732; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:22:35 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA161126 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:22:00 -0700 Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA11242 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:22:00 -0700 Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.189]) by smtp.tznet.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 3483300; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:21:57 -0500 Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2F089B1; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:29:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <20001018222912.A877@tznet.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:29:12 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Michael Urban To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Oops.. Sorry.. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Oops. Sorry. I just was looking through the archives again and I did find a thread on the From buffer overflow problem. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA03975; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA11540; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:33:33 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA21398; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:32:43 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA124300 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:38 -0700 Received: from usc.edu (root@usc.edu [128.125.253.136]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA25498 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:37 -0700 Received: from skat.usc.edu (root@skat.usc.edu [128.125.253.131]) by usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with ESMTP id JAA24730 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cohiba (cohiba.usc.edu [128.125.10.160]) by skat.usc.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/usc) with ESMTP id e9JGUUX02630 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:25 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mike Walker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: kerberos for PC-Pine In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: walker@skat.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Does PC Pine support Kerberos? thanks, Mike -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA00192; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA17617; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:22:04 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA22944; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:21:18 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA190310 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:08 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA23963 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:08 -0700 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA07442 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:08 -0700 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9JJH7w23073 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:07 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We still exist and we read the list. We're not very good at coming up with official responses. The newmail check buffer overflow bug will be fixed in Pine 4.30. We are trying to get 4.30 out as soon as we can. We are almost always overly optimistic when we predict release dates so we don't predict release dates publicly anymore. But what the heck, probably next week. There will still be 3 or 4000 possible format string vulnerabilities so we would guess that we'll remain on the forbidden list. I suppose if we changed calls like strcpy(buf, "xyz") into strncpy(buf, "xyz", buflen) they would take us off the list. Maybe we'll do that some day. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote: > I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list on > this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a pine > development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this list. > > Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering > if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore? > > John Lange From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA01266; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA17710; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:25:02 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA53534; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:23:34 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA193624 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:35 -0700 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA12902 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:34 -0700 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA19106; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9JJJWL23257; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:33 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: disable LDAP record view? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN No way to disable it in pine without source code mods. It seems kind of silly to disable it, though. It is still available over the net and will be viewable in other applications. Seems like you need to disable it at the ldap server. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 premeau@uwp.edu wrote: > Hey all -- > > Due to a complaint brought up by a student, we are trying to find a way to > disable the full LDAP directory view in Pine and PC-Pine. > > The reason being is that our Dean of Student's is interperting FERPA to > mean that we can not have the Student's ID number displayed anywere -- even > if it is not convertable to a ID number usable anywhere else.. (it's not a > disguised SSN). > > Before we get the lawywers involved to discussed the finer points of > FERPA, is there anyway we disable this display? (Out of sight, out of > mind.) > > Thanks, > Steve. > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA27436; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA19962; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:31:03 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA32686; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:30:02 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA38416 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:28:36 -0700 Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu (qmailr@isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.211.213]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA07248 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:28:36 -0700 Received: (qmail 58839 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Oct 2000 20:28:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Oct 2000 20:28:35 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:28:35 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Frank Tobin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: ftobin@palanthas.neverending.org X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Steve Hubert, at 12:17 -0700 on Thu, 19 Oct 2000, wrote: > I suppose if we changed calls like > > strcpy(buf, "xyz") into > strncpy(buf, "xyz", buflen) > > they would take us off the list. Maybe we'll do that some day. They would likely take you off the list if you did. The multitude of these un-n'd str* calls appears to be the overriding, but not only, factor in the decision. Ran: Isn't C just awful with strings? :) -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA32461; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA20221; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:38:30 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA42164; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:37:35 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA109690 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:36:37 -0700 Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA09255 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:36:36 -0700 Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id QAA01396; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:36:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:35:56 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Peterson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: HTML mode In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: pete@gort.office.aol.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** Dan Peterson (pete@aol.net) wrote today: > > :) I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client > :) neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the > :) Content-Type header is usually missing. > :) > :) I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get > :) pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as > :) such? > > Hello Dan, > > Something you can try to see how it works for you is to use > "display-filters". You can make some educated guesses like "if the > first string of a line is , then the message is a message in > text/html format". Of course the guess can be incorrect, but it works > most of the times. All you would need to do is add the following text > to your sending-filters configuration option: > > _BEGINNING()_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_ > > and after that > > _BEGINNING()_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_ > > That will take care of most of the messages. > > Now, about the disadvantages of this method. > > - The filter will be activated when you intend to reply the message, that > is to say, you'll run lynx when you want to reply to the message. > > - If a message is not in text/html format it will still be processed by > lynx if the filter is activated and the output may look ugly. > > In any case above, after quitting lynx you'll see the unprocessed > message, so you won't lose anything and may have gained something. Hmmm, I'm a bit confused, you mention display-filters at first, then switch to sending-filters. Was that just a typo? I'm using PC-PINE, so I'd need to do make the display-filter command do something different, since I don't have lynx. Perhaps a perl script that just looked at the message and added the correct Content-Type header? Or does the display-filter even get the headers? As for sending-filter, I'm really not interested in changing the text when I send it... at least that wasn't my original question. All I want to be able to do is VIEW an email that contains HTML, but does NOT use a Content-Type of "text/html" (perhaps no Content-Type at all). Since Pine is already capable of displaying the HTML, it would sure be nice if there was some toggle (like the show headers toggle), that said "View this message as if it's HTML... regardless of the Content-Type"... maybe like "^H". I wonder if there's any possibility something like that could be included in the imminent 4.3x release. :-) From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA14054; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01827; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:44:01 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA34954; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:42:46 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA202878 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:42:05 -0700 Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA10470 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:42:05 -0700 Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id QAA01440 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:41:56 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Peterson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Replying to html mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: pete@gort.office.aol.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I sent the message over a year ago... seems like about the time 4.20 or 4.21 came out. I've noticed something else about this... when I originally reply to the email, it looks fine. But if I "^O" to postpone it, then continue it later, that's when it gets screwed up. I'm wondering if there are any patches for this, or if perhaps it will be fixed in 4.3x? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 20:51:03 +0100 (BST) From: Alan Thew To: Dan Peterson Cc: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Replying to html mail we've seen this before. It's a bug IMO. -- Alan Thew alan.thew@liverpool.ac.uk Computing Services,University of Liverpool Fax: +44 151 794-4442 On Thu, 2 Sep 1999 18:12 , Dan Peterson said: > I've noticed that sometimes Pine seems to use the "Content-type:" > header of the original mail message when replying. Is this the way it > should be? > > The problem is, the "Content-type" is "text/html", but the actual > content is really "text/plain". So when the message is viewed, all > the text is wrapped together. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA06659; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01991; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:42 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37962; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:08 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA202976 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:45:50 -0700 Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA17374; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:45:49 -0700 Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id QAA01474; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:45:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:45:41 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Peterson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Disconnected support (was: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Scott Leibrand X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: pete@gort.office.aol.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote: > Major new additions include: > > * Configuration flexibility > + pine configurations can now be stored remotely on an imap server > for access from different locations without the need to configure > for each location. > + configuration may be split into two parts: generic configuration > and exceptional, per-platform configuration. > + signatures can now be stored remotely or as part of the pinerc > file > + for configuration options which are lists, inheritance is > supported > * New security features (SSL support, etc.) > * Minor rule enhancements Any chance these "Minor rule enhancements" would include some Role handling... specifically, supporting ^P and ^N to select a Role? I believe I wasn't the only one that wanted that particular feature added back in. ;-) On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote: > [...] > > - What happened to ^P and ^N in the Roles Selection screen? Now it's > a two-step process to choose an alternate role, where before it was > only one. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA12981; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA21080; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:04:08 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA16134; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:03:17 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA38412 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:02:16 -0700 Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA11629 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:02:14 -0700 Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40]) by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA41744 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:02:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:02:08 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: kerberos for PC-Pine In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mike Walker wrote: > Does PC Pine support Kerberos? http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/sysadmins.html#10.3 -- Gopi Sundaram gopi@cs.sc.edu http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA19344; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA21176; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:07:04 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA33890; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:06:24 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA38564 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:05:23 -0700 Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA12334 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:05:22 -0700 Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40]) by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA41785 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:05:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:05:15 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: HTML mode In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote: > Hmmm, I'm a bit confused, you mention display-filters at first, then > switch to sending-filters. Was that just a typo? Yes. It should be display filters all the way through. > I'm using PC-PINE You may not be able to use filters, because the Pipe command does not work correctly on PC-Pine. I could be wrong on this point though. Gopi. -- Gopi Sundaram gopi@cs.sc.edu http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA08557; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA26217; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:44:34 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA15438; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:57 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA76378 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:07 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA15997 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:07 -0700 Received: from goedel2.math.washington.edu (goedel2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.11]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA143536; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Replying to html mail In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dan Peterson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Dan Peterson (pete@aol.net) wrote today: :) I sent the message over a year ago... seems like about the time 4.20 or :) 4.21 came out. :) :) I've noticed something else about this... when I originally reply to the :) email, it looks fine. But if I "^O" to postpone it, then continue it :) later, that's when it gets screwed up. :) :) I'm wondering if there are any patches for this, or if perhaps it will be :) fixed in 4.3x? I do not see the bug you mention in the pre-release of pine4.30 which is coming soon, so it must have been fixed. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA20486; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA26632; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:56:58 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA25324; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:56:30 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA158906 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:55:43 -0700 Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA12944 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:55:43 -0700 Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id TAA02814 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:55:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:55:32 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Peterson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Sort order INBOX/folder MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: pete@gort.office.aol.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and folders? I like to have my INBOX sorted by "arrival", so I can look at the bottom to see what the latest mail is. Often times I let email (that I'm supposed to do something with) sit in my inbox for a while, before I save it to a folder. But when I go look in the folder, it appears the "arrival" date is the date it was saved in the folder, not the date it originally received in the INBOX. So, I end up sorting a folder by Date every time I go into it. It would be nice to have a default sort-order for folders (not including INBOX) that was by "Date", instead of "Arrival". Anyway to do that? -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Peterson (dbpete@aol.com) - AOL, Dulles, VA 703-265-0226 --------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA25870; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA27434; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:31:28 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA34796; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:30:51 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA116062 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:30:12 -0700 Received: from redtail.med.unc.edu (redtail.med.unc.edu [152.19.4.7]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA23709 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:30:12 -0700 Received: from pc523h7-01.med.unc.edu (pc523h7-01.med.unc.edu [152.19.59.130]) by redtail.med.unc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22457 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:30:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:30:11 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Christopher F. Martin" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: cmartin@grayhawk.med.unc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote: > Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and > folders? > > I like to have my INBOX sorted by "arrival", so I can look at the bottom > to see what the latest mail is. > > Often times I let email (that I'm supposed to do something with) sit in my > inbox for a while, before I save it to a folder. But when I go look in > the folder, it appears the "arrival" date is the date it was saved in the > folder, not the date it originally received in the INBOX. > > So, I end up sorting a folder by Date every time I go into it. > > It would be nice to have a default sort-order for folders (not including > INBOX) that was by "Date", instead of "Arrival". > > Anyway to do that? Along these lines, using PC-Pine 4.20, I find that when I sort non-INBOX folders by 'Date' ($,D), I get an index sorted by true date sent, but when I sort by 'Arrival' ($,A), it seems to ignore year so that, for instance, April 1999 and April 2000 messages are sorted one after another, followed by May 1999. What was the intended difference between sorting by 'Date' versus 'Arrival'? What is the purpose of 'Arrival' ignoring year or is this a bug? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Christopher F. Martin School of Medicine Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Phone: 919.966.9340 Fax: 919.966.7592 email: cmartin@unc.edu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Dan Peterson (dbpete@aol.com) - AOL, Dulles, VA 703-265-0226 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA31874; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA27660; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:07 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA21672; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:42:33 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA195156 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:41:42 -0700 Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu (qmailr@isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.211.213]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA31356 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:41:41 -0700 Received: (qmail 59602 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Oct 2000 00:41:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Oct 2000 00:41:41 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:41:39 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Frank Tobin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Christopher F. Martin" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: ftobin@palanthas.neverending.org X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christopher F. Martin, at 20:30 -0400 on Thu, 19 Oct 2000, wrote: > Along these lines, using PC-Pine 4.20, I find that when I sort > non-INBOX folders by 'Date' ($,D), I get an index sorted by true date > sent, but when I sort by 'Arrival' ($,A), it seems to ignore year so > that, for instance, April 1999 and April 2000 messages are sorted one > after another, followed by May 1999. What was the intended difference > between sorting by 'Date' versus 'Arrival'? What is the purpose of > 'Arrival' ignoring year or is this a bug? Arrival is the order in which messages exist in your Inbox as-is; this box is simply appended to when new messages arrive. When sorting by arrival, Pine likely does not look at any headers whatesover, including the Date. Sorting by date is sorting by the time which a message was sent. Both of these bits of information can be found by looking into the help of the sort-key option in the Configuration. - -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAjnvlMUACgkQVv/RCiYMT6Pi/ACeOrHNIxyCmM0ZXiJUVkLn0x44 f4kAnAiGGxR5Fhvh9lLNxp7LXZMq+cBi =sy3+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA00307; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA09358; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:32 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA18004; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:02 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA83504 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:21 -0700 Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu (qmailr@isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.211.213]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA25460 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:20 -0700 Received: (qmail 59614 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Oct 2000 00:43:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Oct 2000 00:43:20 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:43:19 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Frank Tobin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dan Peterson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: ftobin@palanthas.neverending.org X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan Peterson, at 19:55 -0400 on Thu, 19 Oct 2000, wrote: > I like to have my INBOX sorted by "arrival", so I can look at the bottom > to see what the latest mail is. According to the help of the "sort-key" option in the Configuration (Main Menu->Setup->Configuaration), arrival is the default, but it might have been overriden by a global configuaration for your system, so you can just re-set your sorting desire in the "sort-key" option. - -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAjnvlSgACgkQVv/RCiYMT6MOkwCeIRj5OQEOyolcwGyKnOQi6eY/ MbAAoIDQPurXo0CdeRWwzA/Cqhb8b8N8 =mNTA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA13420; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA10254; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:25:21 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA22630; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:40 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA125108 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:03 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA26120 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:03 -0700 Received: from goedel2.math.washington.edu (goedel2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.11]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA167215; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dan Peterson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Dan Peterson (pete@aol.net) wrote today: :) Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and :) folders? You can use a patch that I wrote which allows you to do this, (pick the patch from the address in my signature). It is called "define your own rules... etc", and in particular you can define specific sort orders for specific folders, so for example you can have any newsgroup sorted by OrderedSubject, Inbox, sorted by arrival and saved-messages sorted by date. Once you apply the patch you have to add to your "new-rules" configuration variables some rules that specify which action is to be taken. You can add as many rules as you like, only the first one which is satisfied at any time will be executed. For example, this one sorts every folder that is not INBOX by Date. INBOX will be sorted in the way you specify your default sort, which is usually by Arrival _FOLDER_ != {INBOX} => _SORT_{Date} or this sorts every newsgroup by OrderedSubject _FOLDER_ == {_NEWS_} => _SORT_{OrderedSubj} or this sorts saved-messages by From _FOLDER_ == {saved-messages} => _SORT_{From} etc, there are much more things you can do with it. I have much more examples in my web page. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id TAA26955; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA30238; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:54:02 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id TAA34590; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:53:13 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA132112 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:52:31 -0700 Received: from fester.comp-u-port.net (IDENT:root@fester.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.61]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA17939 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:52:30 -0700 Received: from pugsley.comp-u-port.net (pugsley.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.34]) by fester.comp-u-port.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA31127 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:52:22 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:52:21 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Pine-info To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: dld@mail.comp-u-port.net X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear Pine developers: Since I am seeing talk about a pending release of Pine 4.30 and have not heard anything about my post of Oct 4th , I was wondering if this bug (IMO) has been noted and corrected. Thanks. -- ******************************************************************* Derek Diget ******************************************************************* From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA09671; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA12540; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:54 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id UAA13890; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:04 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA116036 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA19129 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700 Received: from mailhost2.u.washington.edu (mailhost2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.2]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA17340; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700 Received: from jfranklin_ndc.nebula.washington.edu (D-128-95-135-224.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.224]) by mailhost2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA24218; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine-info X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jpf@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Pine-info wrote: > Since I am seeing talk about a pending release of Pine 4.30 and > have not heard anything about my post of Oct 4th > , I > was wondering if this bug (IMO) has been noted and corrected. Hi Derek, We are aware of this problem, and it is on the list of things to consider for a future release. In 4.30, you will be able to use the "^To Files" dialog to attach files whose name contain more than 80 characters (which you couldn't do in 4.21), but you still will not be able to type in attachments longer than that. I think that the dialog will be sufficient for most cases (and hopefully yours), but those who will wish to manually type in file paths of longer than 80 characters will still be stuck. Jeff -- Jeff Franklin Networks and Distributed Computing University of Washington From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA31165; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA31573; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:58:21 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id UAA32710; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:57:16 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA83568 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:56:29 -0700 Received: from fester.comp-u-port.net (IDENT:root@fester.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.61]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA15261 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:56:28 -0700 Received: from pugsley.comp-u-port.net (pugsley.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.34]) by fester.comp-u-port.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA31446 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:56:20 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:56:19 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Pine-info To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: dld@mail.comp-u-port.net X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Oct 19, 2000 at 20:20, Jeff Franklin wrote: =>On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Pine-info wrote: =>> Since I am seeing talk about a pending release of Pine 4.30 and =>> have not heard anything about my post of Oct 4th =>> , I =>> was wondering if this bug (IMO) has been noted and corrected. => =>We are aware of this problem, and it is on the list of things to consider =>for a future release. In 4.30, you will be able to use the "^To Files" =>dialog to attach files whose name contain more than 80 characters (which =>you couldn't do in 4.21), but you still will not be able to type in =>attachments longer than that. I think that the dialog will be sufficient =>for most cases (and hopefully yours), but those who will wish to manually =>type in file paths of longer than 80 characters will still be stuck. First, thanks for the reply. Let me see if I understand your post. In v4.30+ user should be able to attach files using the "^To Files" dialog with a path (and filename/extension) over 80 characters, but you will not be able to type straight into the attchmnt line the the same file (path/filename/extension over 80 characters). (I attach through the "^To Files" dialog anyways. :) -- ******************************************************************* Derek Diget ******************************************************************* From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id VAA20484; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA13583; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:14:11 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id VAA40868; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:13:24 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA22528 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA26826 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700 Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.2]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA06423; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700 Received: from jfranklin_ndc.nebula.washington.edu (D-128-95-135-224.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.224]) by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id VAA02064; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine-info X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jpf@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Pine-info wrote: > Let me see if I understand your post. > > In v4.30+ user should be able to attach files using the "^To > Files" dialog with a path (and filename/extension) over 80 characters, > but you will not be able to type straight into the attchmnt line the > the same file (path/filename/extension over 80 characters). Exactly. You understood me correctly. The 80 character thing is a limitation of pico, which currently has no way of handling the typing of characters longer than the screen's width for something like attachments. > (I attach through the "^To Files" dialog anyways. :) I thought so. :) Jeff From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA19184; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA09287; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:40 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA40788; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:08 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA179490 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:30:00 -0700 Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA05319 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:29:59 -0700 Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id JAA08572; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:29:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:29:23 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Peterson To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: pete@gort.office.aol.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** Dan Peterson (pete@aol.net) wrote today: > > :) Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and > :) folders? > > You can use a patch that I wrote which allows you to do this, (pick > the patch from the address in my signature). It is called "define your > own rules... etc", and in particular you can define specific sort > orders for specific folders, so for example you can have any newsgroup > sorted by OrderedSubject, Inbox, sorted by arrival and saved-messages > sorted by date. > > Once you apply the patch you have to add to your "new-rules" > configuration variables some rules that specify which action is to be > taken. You can add as many rules as you like, only the first one which > is satisfied at any time will be executed. > > For example, this one sorts every folder that is not INBOX by Date. > INBOX will be sorted in the way you specify your default sort, which > is usually by Arrival > > _FOLDER_ != {INBOX} => _SORT_{Date} > > or this sorts every newsgroup by OrderedSubject > > _FOLDER_ == {_NEWS_} => _SORT_{OrderedSubj} > > or this sorts saved-messages by From > > _FOLDER_ == {saved-messages} => _SORT_{From} > > etc, there are much more things you can do with it. I have much more > examples in my web page. This sounds very cool. Unfortunately, I'm once again hampered by the fact that I'm using PC-PINE and don't have the source. Why is it the source for PC-PINE isn't available? From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA12884; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA10411; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:30:28 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA21208; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:29:58 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA202714 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:29:08 -0700 Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA11485 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:29:07 -0700 Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40]) by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA50314; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:29:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:29:00 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Dan Peterson X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote: > Why is it the source for PC-PINE isn't available? There's a copyright issue with the bundled spellchecker, tha tonly allows for binary distribution. -- Gopi Sundaram gopi@cs.sc.edu http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA16451; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA11784; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:24:22 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA42028; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:23:42 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA202640 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:22:22 -0700 Received: from smtp01.primenet.com (smtp01.primenet.com [206.165.6.131]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA10727 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:22:21 -0700 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp01.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA05533; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:21:30 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr09.primenet.com(206.165.6.209) via SMTP by smtp01.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAlBaOQh; Fri Oct 20 08:16:36 2000 Received: from localhost (fairall@localhost) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA20497; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:17:25 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:17:24 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Leslie Fairall To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: usr09.primenet.com: fairall owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Why is pine on a forbidden list? What list is this? ***** ************************************************** "Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It's just very particular about who it makes friends with." mailto:fairall@primenet.com From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA21988; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA26347; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:37:35 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA14468; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:36:55 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA119214 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:35:29 -0700 Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA20727 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:35:14 -0700 Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.170]) by smtp.tznet.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 4143000; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:35:05 -0500 Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8684FA7; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:42:27 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <20001020104227.A724@tznet.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:42:27 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Michael Urban To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: ; from fairall@primenet.com on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:17:24AM -0400 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Leslie Fairall X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Pine is currently on the forbidden list in the FreeBSD ports collection because of a buffer overflow bug in the From field. In a nutshell, a very long from header will overflow a buffer in Pine, causing it to crash. The problem with this is that a when the buffer overflows, it can allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on your system. All he has to do is send a malicious email message that overflows Pine's buffer. This is, unfortunatly, only one of many thousands of potential vulnerabilites in Pine, so I doubt that fixing this one problem will get it off the forbidden list. I would like to see Pine fixed since I really like Pine. However, right now, I am using Mutt just to be safe. A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers prior to delivery. On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:17:24AM -0400, Leslie Fairall wrote: > Why is pine on a forbidden list? What list is this? > > > > ***** ************************************************** > "Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It's just very > particular about who it makes friends with." > mailto:fairall@primenet.com > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA09999; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA28005; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:33:09 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA18642; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:32:25 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA179504 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:31:29 -0700 Received: from fw1.uhc.com (gw.uhc.com [168.183.16.135]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA23802 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:31:27 -0700 Received: from fw1.uhc.com (root@localhost) by fw1.uhc.com with ESMTP id LAA04433 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:31:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pike.uhc.com (pike.uhc.com [168.183.51.8]) by fw1.uhc.com with ESMTP id LAB04429 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:31:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from umw5002638 (UMW5002638.uhc.com [10.12.149.57]) by pike.uhc.com (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with SMTP id LAA503324 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:31:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <001601c03ab3$2d8f31d0$39950c0a@uhc.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:30:43 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Jonathan Hutchins" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine IMAP with MS Exchange 5.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm running Pine on RHLinux 6.2, and one of the things I'd like to access is the mail on my local MS Exchange (5.5) server. I've conferred Pine to include the server via IMAP. I can see all of the folders for my Exchange account, and I can seem mail in subfolders, but I can't see any mail in the primary "Inbox" folder. Most, but not all of my folders are sub-folders of the Inbox. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA21528; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA14034; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:38:27 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA37792; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:37:58 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA42344 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:36:48 -0700 Received: from localhost.edlund.org (m96.ryd.student.liu.se [130.236.214.96]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA23759 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:36:47 -0700 Received: by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 24A4241052; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2203741051; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: <20001020104227.A724@tznet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Michael Urban X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Michael Urban wrote: > A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have > an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers > prior to delivery. Do you have a good procmail rule to kill mails with too long (for Pine) header lines? TIA, Henrik -- Henrik Edlund (HE2914-RIPE) http://www.edlund.org/ "Never implement limitations." -- Henrik Edlund From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA16744; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA14322; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:47 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA40224; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:11 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA151712 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:47:07 -0700 Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA03510 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:47:07 -0700 Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.170]) by smtp.tznet.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 4183100; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:47:03 -0500 Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CA2134E; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:54:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <20001020115429.A1159@tznet.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:54:29 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Michael Urban To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: ; from henrik@edlund.org on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 06:36:43PM +0200 References: <20001020104227.A724@tznet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Henrik Edlund X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Unfortunately, I don't. But I can point you to a web resource that I think will probably be very helpful. I haven't actually read most of this web site, but it does look like it addresses the issue. http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html Hope that URL helps you out some. On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 06:36:43PM +0200, Henrik Edlund wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Michael Urban wrote: > > > A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have > > an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers > > prior to delivery. > > Do you have a good procmail rule to kill mails with too long (for > Pine) header lines? > > TIA, Henrik > > -- > Henrik Edlund (HE2914-RIPE) > http://www.edlund.org/ > > "Never implement limitations." > -- Henrik Edlund > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA15017; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA28595; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:42 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA30026; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:10 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA42346 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:51:21 -0700 Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA04766 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:51:20 -0700 Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.170]) by smtp.tznet.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 4185400; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:51:16 -0500 Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 65BFB4E; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:58:43 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <20001020115843.B1159@tznet.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:58:43 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Michael Urban To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities In-Reply-To: <20001020104227.A724@tznet.com>; from murban@tznet.com on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:42:27AM -0500 References: <20001020104227.A724@tznet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Leslie Fairall X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Oh. Something else I should mention just to make sure there is no misunderstanding. These bugs are not limitted to FreeBSD. They affect Pine running on all platforms. FreeBSD just does a reasonably good job of warning their users about bugs in applications and not just the OS itself. On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:42:27AM -0500, Michael Urban wrote: > Pine is currently on the forbidden list in the FreeBSD ports > collection because of a buffer overflow bug in the From field. In a > nutshell, a very long from header will overflow a buffer in Pine, > causing it to crash. The problem with this is that a when the buffer > overflows, it can allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on > your system. All he has to do is send a malicious email message that > overflows Pine's buffer. > > This is, unfortunatly, only one of many thousands of potential > vulnerabilites in Pine, so I doubt that fixing this one problem will > get it off the forbidden list. > > I would like to see Pine fixed since I really like Pine. However, > right now, I am using Mutt just to be safe. > > A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have > an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers > prior to delivery. > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:17:24AM -0400, Leslie Fairall wrote: > > Why is pine on a forbidden list? What list is this? > > > > > > > > ***** ************************************************** > > "Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It's just very > > particular about who it makes friends with." > > mailto:fairall@primenet.com > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA25254; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA20427; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:35:58 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37824; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:34:48 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA187504 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:31:42 -0700 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org (root@vger.timpanogas.org [207.109.151.240]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA10739 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:31:41 -0700 Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (SSMarie-ppp111273.sympatico.ca [216.209.120.172]) by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03837 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:28:29 -0600 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08579 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:31:37 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:31:37 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: [BUG] PINE crash with HTML message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs X-Sender: mharris@asdf.capslock.lan X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have an HTML SPAM message which some arsehole sent me that causes PINE 4.21 to crash if I try to forward it. Who do I send this bug report to, and will a bug fix be made if I do? The message is multipart MIME. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ---------------------------------------------------------------------- #[Mike A. Harris bash tip #2 - custom colorized bash prompts] # For a color prompt, put the following at the bottom of your ~/.bash_profile TTYNAME=$(tty | sed -e 's/^\/dev\///' -e 's/^tty//');DRED=31;DGREEN=32 BROWN=33;DBLUE=34;DMAGENTA=35;DCYAN=36;GREY=37;DGREY=30\;1;RED=31\;1 GREEN=32\;1;YELLOW=33\;1;BLUE=34\;1;MAGENTA=35\;1;CYAN=36\;1;WHITE=37\;1 CLRUSER=$CYAN ; CLRHOST=$YELLOW # Set the user and host colors here PS1="$TTYNAME \[\033[${CLRUSER}m\]\u\[\033[0;m\]" export PS1="${PS1}@\[\033[${CLRHOST}m\]\h\\[\033[0;m\]:\w\$ " -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA11791; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA20457; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:52 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA38930; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:14 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA81080 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:34:22 -0700 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org (root@vger.timpanogas.org [207.109.151.240]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA14036 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:34:21 -0700 Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (SSMarie-ppp111273.sympatico.ca [216.209.120.172]) by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03853 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:31:09 -0600 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08588 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:34:18 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:34:18 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: [BUG] PINE crash exit message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs X-Sender: mharris@asdf.capslock.lan X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My previous post about PINE crashing, I forgot to add the error message: Problem detected: "Received abort signal". Pine Exiting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting Copyright 2000 all rights reserved ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So, if anybody wants to have free hardware sent to them, don't call me, but instead write your own operating system. It has worked every time for me. Linus Torvalds -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id VAA08568; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA28619; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:43:15 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id VAA35668; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:37:02 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA62882 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:34:09 -0700 Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA14226 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:34:09 -0700 Received: from computer (user-33qse43.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.56.131]) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA05763 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 00:34:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <001c01c03caa$77e24bc0$8338aec7@computer> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:34:00 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Raghuram Kalletla" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: problems compiling PINE in Macintosh OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180" X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey all, I've been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public = Beta) from the command prompt without success. Does anybody on the list = have experience in compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an = appropriate port for OS X so I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the = "./build" command and here's what I got in the end:=20 =20 Links to executables are in bin directory: __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex size: can't open file: bin/pine (No such file or directory) 589824 12288 0 634880 1236992 12e000 bin/mtest 634880 20480 0 688128 1343488 148000 bin/imapd size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or directory) Done The other ports I tried were: aux, bsd, bsf, gen, and mac. When I used = these, I got this message at the end of the compilation: =20 Links to executables are in bin directory: __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex size: can't open file: bin/pine (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/mtest (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/imapd (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or directory) size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or directory) Done Any help to find the appropriate port and/or tips will be appreciated. Raghuram Kalletla ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey all,
          &nbs= p; I've=20 been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public Beta) from the = command=20 prompt without success. Does anybody on the list have = experience in=20 compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an appropriate port for = OS X so=20 I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the "./build" command and here's what = I got=20 in the end:
 
Links to executables are in bin=20 directory:
__TEXT  __DATA  __OBJC  others =20 dec     hex
size: can't open file: bin/pine (No = such file=20 or directory)
589824  12288  =20 0       634880  1236992 12e000 =20 bin/mtest
634880  20480  =20 0       688128  1343488 148000 =20 bin/imapd
size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or=20 directory)
size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or=20 directory)
Done
 
The other ports I tried were: aux, bsd, = bsf, gen,=20 and mac. When I used these, I got this message at the end of the=20 compilation:
 
Links to executables are in bin=20 directory:
__TEXT  = __DATA =20 __OBJC  others  dec     hex
size: can't = open=20 file: bin/pine (No such file or directory)
size: can't open file: bin/mtest (No = such file or=20 directory)
size: can't open file: bin/imapd (No such file or=20 directory)
size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or=20 directory)
size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or=20 directory)
Done
 
Any help to find the appropriate = port and/or=20 tips will be appreciated.
 
Raghuram = Kalletla
------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id WAA32561; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA15678; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:30:18 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id WAA18332; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:25:27 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA158794 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:22:40 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA201586; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:22:39 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: problems compiling PINE in Macintosh OS X In-Reply-To: <001c01c03caa$77e24bc0$8338aec7@computer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Raghuram Kalletla X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Raghuram Kalletla wrote: > I've been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public > Beta) from the command prompt without success. Does anybody on the > list have experience in compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an > appropriate port for OS X so I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the > "./build" command and here's what I got in the end: > > Any help to find the appropriate port and/or tips will be appreciated. You need to find or make an OS X port. I'd wait for 4.30, which should be out shortly (within a couple weeks). Here's what Jeff Franklin of the Pine team said in comp.mail.pine. For the complete thread, see http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=679385979&CONTEXT=972278175.748683309&hitnum=0 On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Jeff Franklin wrote: > There will be a Mac OS X port in Pine 4.30. You might want to check > out http://www.macaddict.com. Basically it's a build with the bsd > port, with a few tweaks to the makefiles. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand * Opinions expressed are mine. Everyone else can get their own. :) * * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA12127; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA26930; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:58:25 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA38576; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:56:54 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA194072 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:38 -0700 Received: from vax.area.com (vax.area.com [216.218.218.27]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA03479 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:38 -0700 Received: (qmail 7288 invoked by uid 1828); 24 Oct 2000 01:55:37 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine on Mac OS X. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN forwarded for a nonsubscriber. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Soren Spies Matt, this might not make it to the pine-info@u.washington.edu since I'm not on the list (ie. might get rejected) ... forward it for me if you don't see it or you know that non-members aren't allowed to post it to the list. I actually figured out how to get it to build all at once. :) On Monday, October 23, 2000, at 05:32 PM, Matt Ackeret wrote: > Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:34:00 -0500 > From: "Raghuram Kalletla" > To: > Subject: problems compiling PINE in Macintosh OS X > Message-ID: <001c01c03caa$77e24bc0$8338aec7@computer> > > Hey all, > I've been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public = > Beta) from the command prompt without success. Does anybody on the list = > have experience in compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an = > appropriate port for OS X so I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the = > "./build" command and here's what I got in the end:=20 I remember getting stuff like that ... it was a bummer > The other ports I tried were: aux, bsd, bsf, gen, and mac. When I used = > these, I got this message at the end of the compilation: I also tried bsd and bsf ... bsf nearly did the trick (see below) > Any help to find the appropriate port and/or tips will be appreciated. This is the story of how I got pine 4.21 to compile. It is initially ugly and but does result in a nice packaged solution if someone who can make these changes will do them to the next release of pine. log-based directions (see below before you do this): 0) cd pine; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar; 1) cd ../pico; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar 2) comment out -ltermcap from line 47 of makefile.dar 3) cd ../pine; comment out -ltermlib from line 64 of makefile.dar 4) cd ..; build dar [get pico and pilot] 5) delete only line "-lcrypt" in c-client/LDFLAGS 6) build dar [get pine] 7) cd imapd; make 8) cd ..; build dar [get imapd] 9) cd imap; make 10) cd ..; build dar [get mtest] [these do work ...] yuck ... hey, wait a second real directions: 1) cd pine; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar; 2) cd ../pico; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar 3) delete -ltermcap from line 47 of makefile.dar 4) cd ../pine; delete -ltermlib from line 64 of makefile.dar 5) cd ../imap; add "dar" to target line containing bsf in Makefile 6) cd src/osdep/unix; around line 192 of Makefile, create a new section called "dar" that is the same as bsf and looks a bit like this (remember I have pine 4.21: change name and drop the -lcrypt and preceeding \): dar: # Darwin (aka Mac OS X) $(BUILD) `cat EXTRASPECIALS` OS=bsi SIGTYPE=psx \ SPOOLDIR=/var \ ACTIVEFILE=/usr/local/news/lib/active \ RSHPATH=/usr/bin/rsh \ BASECFLAGS="-g -O -pipe -DNFSKLUDGE" 7) cd ../../../..; build dar I get (woohoo after much labor!): Links to executables are in bin directory: __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 3194880 233472 0 712704 4141056 3f3000 bin/pine 589824 12288 0 634880 1236992 12e000 bin/mtest 634880 20480 0 688128 1343488 148000 bin/imapd 270336 12288 0 24576 307200 4b000 bin/pico 266240 12288 0 24576 303104 4a000 bin/pilot Done Let me know if you have any trouble, Soren P.S. gotta wonder what the "*** TEMPORARY for PINE 4.10 BUILD" messages were doing in my pine 4.21 distribution. -- Soren Spies Apple Computer, Inc. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id DAA25628; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA22617; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:07:19 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id DAA22066; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:06:21 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA48104 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:04:22 -0700 Received: from zeus.compulink.gr (zeus.compulink.gr [195.242.129.14]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA19768 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:04:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (pantonop@localhost) by zeus.compulink.gr (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9OA4J926824 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:04:19 +0300 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:04:19 +0300 (EEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Antonopoulos Panagiotis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: address book and distribution list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear list members, I have the following problem, and wonder if there is an easy and safe way to tackle it. I have, it seems for long, during conversions and additions to my address book, started taking certain address as "distribution list", instead of a single entry. If I try to delete that list, even at the risk of losing these addresses, then the remaining addresses, correctly stored, appear in reverse order, so, I really do not know where to stop. I would like to have all those addresses labelled as distribution lists, shown correctly as single addresses in my address book. If there is a not too complicated way of doing this, I would be most grateful to hear from you. I have pine v4.20 and 4.21 in my two accounts, which I interact, hence the problem may have arrisen. With Kindest Regards, Panagiotis -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA11926; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA16560; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:45:49 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA22602; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:43:42 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA154996 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:41:36 -0700 Received: from gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.85]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA16187 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:41:35 -0700 Received: from xAplos (sdn-ar-002flflauP331.dialsprint.net [168.191.74.237]) by gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA27537 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010241841.LAA27537@gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:41:25 -0400 Reply-To: macrod@earthlink.net Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark F Rodriguez To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v337) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN <= flushleft>Helvetica28L;56L;8= 4L;112L;140L;168L;196L;224L;252L;280L;308L;336L;I've just = downloaded Pine from = 1A1A,1A1A,FFFFhttp://www.macaddict.com/os= x/geeks.html and was able to build pico, pilot, = mtest and imapd just fine. However, when making pine I got the following = error (btw, I used ./build osx): cc -g -DDEBUG -DBSDDEF -DSYSTYPE=3D\"BSD\" -c -o send.o send.c send.c:6696: illegal function call: encountered end of stream make: *** [send.o] Error 1 =20 I guess I'm wondering has anyone been able to build Pine on Apple's new = OS X public beta and if so can I use the Pine files from = 1A1A,1A1A,FFFFhttp://www.washington.edu/p= ine/ to do it? I understand that some changes have to be made to = ./{pico,pine}/makefile.xxx, ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.h, and possibly = ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.ic but it looks like someone has already done = this work. Unfortunately, the link to = 1A1A,1A1A,FFFFftp://next-ftp.peak.org/pub= /rhapsody/Applications/Unix/Mail/ doesn't seem to = have any files available. If anyone can help me in getting pine to run on Mac OSX, I'd be greatly = appreciative. I'm tired of using the built in Mail program:-( Thanks in advance, -Mark= -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA30964; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA17454; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:13:48 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA53730; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:12:26 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA202518 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:06:27 -0700 Received: from mm02snlnto.sandia.gov (mm02snlnto.sandia.gov [132.175.109.21]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA12913 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:06:26 -0700 Received: from 132.175.109.1 by mm02snlnto.sandia.gov with ESMTP ( WorldSecure Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.5); Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06:19 -0600 Received: from es08snlnt.sandia.gov (es08snlnt.sandia.gov [134.253.130.11]) by sass165.sandia.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9OJ6JD18079 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06: 19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sasg829.sandia.gov ([134.253.45.38]) by es08snlnt.sandia.gov with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 4TM67MDL; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06:17 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06:19 -0600 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Daniel Sands" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Server-Uuid: 7edb479a-fd89-11d2-9a77-0090273cd58c X-WSS-ID: 15EB02211965581-01-01 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN So use a different spell checker, or offer a source version without it. Or is it too much integrated into the program? > > Why is it the source for PC-PINE isn't available? > > There's a copyright issue with the bundled spellchecker, tha tonly > allows for binary distribution. > > -- > Gopi Sundaram > gopi@cs.sc.edu > http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA32116; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA13169; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:45:28 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA42630; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:44:13 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA73172 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:42:43 -0700 Received: from vax.area.com (vax.area.com [216.218.218.27]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA02086 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:42:43 -0700 Received: (qmail 26064 invoked by uid 1828); 24 Oct 2000 23:42:42 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Updating 'new message' count dynamically MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I've mentioned this before in passing in discussions of other problems/ suggestions, but here it is again on its own as an enhancement request.. (Well, I actually consider it a bug, but maybe others don't.) The problem: pine doesn't update its list of 'new' messages upon expunging or change of status from another email program. And yes, I do frequently use two email programs (IMAP of course) on the same mailbox. The fix: 1) The "most noticable" fix, I would say, would be to count_new_messages() [I sure HOPE there's something at that granularity] after pine has noticed that messages have been expunged.. (it prints the message at the bottom -- it must know somehow!) 2) also count_new_messages() when it notices status of messages have changed (i.e. some went from new to non-new). Hopefully someone can whip this out. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id WAA03605; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA19899; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:08:54 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id WAA40012; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:06:44 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA70288 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:04:26 -0700 Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA26751 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:04:25 -0700 Received: from computer (user-33qsdr6.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.55.102]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA19310; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 01:04:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <001501c03e41$00bf3060$6637aec7@computer> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:04:05 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Raghuram Kalletla" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX References: <200010241841.LAA27537@gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0" X-To: , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'll answer that, since I've spent the past 72 hours trying to compile = Pine on Darwin without any success and finally got it installed from the = MacAddict site.=20 Mark, what you've downloaded from MacAddict's website is a binary. So = you don't have to worry about compiling it again! You're probably = getting those errors because you've used the "osx" port. There is no = such port (as yet) in Pine. The files on MacAddict's website have been = modified to make it compatible with Darwin. Try ./build bsd and it = should compile fine...(NOTE: If you download pine.tar.gz from U = Washington's website and compile it for bsd, you will have problems. The = files on MacAddict's website have been modified for Darwin)...although = you don't have to since it's already been done for you...but if you're = just curious like me, go right ahead.=20 Even though I've got that out of the way, I'm still having problems = configuring Pine to use "sendmail". So if you or anybody on the list = could help me out with that, I'd be greatful. I have OS X installed on = an iMac that's configured to obtain an IP address from a DHCP server.=20 I have the following value set in "smtp-server" in Pine's configuration: /usr/sbin/sendmail (that's where = sendmail is) and this value set in "user-domain": mac-test-machine.uta.edu ("mac-test-machine" is the name = of the computer) When I try to send a message, I get this error: [Error sending: Invalid = host specifier: /usr/sbin/sendmail] Any of you out there know what the problem could be? Raghuram ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mark F Rodriguez=20 To: Pine Discussion Forum=20 Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 1:41 PM Subject: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX I've just downloaded Pine from http://www.macaddict.com/osx/geeks.html = and was able to build pico, pilot, mtest and imapd just fine. However, = when making pine I got the following error (btw, I used ./build osx): cc -g -DDEBUG -DBSDDEF -DSYSTYPE=3D\"BSD\" -c -o send.o send.c send.c:6696: illegal function call: encountered end of stream make: *** [send.o] Error 1 I guess I'm wondering has anyone been able to build Pine on Apple's = new OS X public beta and if so can I use the Pine files from = http://www.washington.edu/pine/ to do it? I understand that some changes have to be made to = ./{pico,pine}/makefile.xxx, ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.h, and possibly = ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.ic but it looks like someone has already done = this work. Unfortunately, the link to = ftp://next-ftp.peak.org/pub/rhapsody/Applications/Unix/Mail/ doesn't = seem to have any files available. If anyone can help me in getting pine to run on Mac OSX, I'd be = greatly appreciative. I'm tired of using the built in Mail program:-( Thanks in advance, -Mark-- = ----------------------------------------------------------------- For = information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: = http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ = ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'll answer that, since I've spent the = past 72=20 hours trying to compile Pine on Darwin without any success and finally = got it=20 installed from the MacAddict site.
 
Mark, what you've downloaded from = MacAddict's=20 website is a binary. So you don't have to worry about compiling it = again! You're=20 probably getting those errors because you've used the "osx" port. There = is no=20 such port (as yet) in Pine. The files on MacAddict's website have been = modified=20 to make it compatible with Darwin. Try ./build bsd and it should compile = fine...(NOTE: If you download pine.tar.gz from U Washington's website = and=20 compile it for bsd, you will have problems. The files on MacAddict's = website=20 have been modified for Darwin)...although you don't have to since it's = already=20 been done for you...but if you're just curious like me, go right ahead.=20
 
Even though I've got that out of the = way, I'm still=20 having problems configuring Pine to use "sendmail". So if you or anybody = on the=20 list could help me out with that, I'd be greatful. I have OS X installed = on an=20 iMac that's configured to obtain an IP address from a DHCP server. =
 
I have the following value set in = "smtp-server" in=20 Pine's configuration:
/usr/sbin/sendmail       &nbs= p;            = ;            =        =20 (that's where sendmail is)
 
and this value set in = "user-domain":
mac-test-machine.uta.edu          &nbs= p;     =20 ("mac-test-machine" is the name of the computer)
 
When I try to send a message, I get = this error:=20 [Error sending: Invalid host specifier: /usr/sbin/sendmail]
 
Any of you out there know what the = problem could=20 be?
 
Raghuram
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mark F=20 Rodriguez
To: Pine=20 Discussion Forum
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 = 1:41=20 PM
Subject: Building Pine 4.21 on = Mac=20 OSX

I've just downloaded Pine from http://www.macaddict.com= /osx/geeks.html=20 and was able to build pico, pilot, mtest and imapd just fine. However, = when=20 making pine I got the following error (btw, I used ./build = osx):

cc -g=20 -DDEBUG -DBSDDEF -DSYSTYPE=3D\"BSD\" -c -o send.o = send.c
send.c:6696: illegal=20 function call: encountered end of stream
make: *** [send.o] Error=20 1

I guess I'm wondering has anyone been able to build Pine on = Apple's=20 new OS X public beta and if so can I use the Pine files from = http://www.washington.edu/pine/=20 to do it?

I understand that some changes have to be made to=20 ./{pico,pine}/makefile.xxx, ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.h, and possibly = ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.ic but it looks like someone has already = done this=20 work. Unfortunately, the link to=20 ftp://next-ftp.peak.org/pub/rhapsody/Applications/Unix/Mai= l/=20 doesn't seem to have any files available.

If anyone can help me = in=20 getting pine to run on Mac OSX, I'd be greatly appreciative. I'm tired = of=20 using the built in Mail program:-(

Thanks in = advance,
-Mark--=20 ----------------------------------------------------------------- For=20 information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:=20 http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/=20 = ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0-- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA13571; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA08929; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:21:51 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA18816; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:45 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA172742 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:19:03 -0700 Received: from ai2.accesinternet.com (root@ai2.accesinternet.com [195.101.235.2]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA29156 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:19:01 -0700 Received: from ar95.dtr.fr (ar95.dtr.fr [212.67.49.95]) by ai2.accesinternet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA24168 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:18:53 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:19:57 +0100 (Paris, Madrid) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gu=E9ny?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: authentification MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Sender: n5851003@accesinternet.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My new ISP requires Authentification function to get into the SMTP server. This function exists on OE and Netscape Messenger. Does PC Pine 4.21 for win 95 have this capability ? If so, how do I activate it ? Thanks in advance -- Patrick Gu=E9ny Nevers France -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA01940; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA10027; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:20:43 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA40418; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:19:36 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA185674 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:18:49 -0700 Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA19742 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:18:48 -0700 Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [193.74.243.97]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA10330 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:18:46 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:18:43 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Piotr Martyniuk To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE and INTERNAL DATA file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: piotr@cactus.sonytel.be X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi! Is possible to turn off feature which store messages like this: From MAILER-DAEMON Wed Oct 25 15:04:44 2000 Date: 25 Oct 2000 15:04:44 +0200 From: Mail System Internal Data Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA Message-ID: <972479084@sonycom.com> X-IMAP: 0969867225 0000000322 Status: RO This text is part of the internal format of your mail folder, and is not a real message. It is created automatically by the mail system software. If deleted, important folder data will be lost, and it will be re-created with the data reset to initial values. in folder $MAIL? Regards Piotr -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA26839; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA10204; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:31:38 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA25618; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:30:31 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA189396 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:29:36 -0700 Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA31986 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:29:33 -0700 Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [193.74.243.97]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA10761 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:29:29 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:29:29 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Piotr Martyniuk To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE strange behaviour MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: piotr@cactus.sonytel.be X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi! I have problem with pine, because they have srange behaviour there. Normally they should skip between new arrived mails if TAB key is pressed and if they reach last message - they should skip to anoter pine catalogue where is next new message. This work on linux machine without any special configuration, just after standard instalation, but this freature don't work on Sun machines and I don't know what is wrong, because I try this with any configuration (also with default generated .pinerc file) and pine still do this same - if reach last mail in pine directory they won't go to another. This behaviour is very tired for me, because I have quite a few directores where I filter my message according to message type (topic, subject, from, ... etc) and is very hard to find where is stored new arrived message (I must get in in each pine directory if I want find new message). Anybody help me resolve this problem? Please! Regards Piotr -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA17462; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA30091; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:54 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA21284; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:25 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA194286 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:38:43 -0700 Received: from legolas.mdh.se (cel95eig@legolas.mdh.se [130.243.77.20]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA00390 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:38:42 -0700 Received: by legolas.mdh.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA28666; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:38:38 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:38:37 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Emil Isberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: smtp-server (was: Re: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX) In-Reply-To: <001501c03e41$00bf3060$6637aec7@computer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: cel95eig@mds.mdh.se X-To: Raghuram Kalletla X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Raghuram Kalletla wrote: >Even though I've got that out of the way, I'm still having problems >configuring Pine to use "sendmail". So if you or anybody on the list >could help me out with that, I'd be greatful. I have OS X installed on >an iMac that's configured to obtain an IP address from a DHCP server. > >I have the following value set in "smtp-server" in Pine's configuration: >/usr/sbin/sendmail (that's where sendmail is) smtp-server is the server pine connects to to send mail... For me that is blank since I use sendmail directly but if one don't have sendmail (or compatible) then that option comes in handy. >and this value set in "user-domain": mac-test-machine.uta.edu >("mac-test-machine" is the name of the computer) user-domain sets the FROM domainpart... normally pine get it from the hostname but it could be wrong and then that option is the one to use. For me I set it to: mds.mdh.se as that is my maildomain... >When I try to send a message, I get this error: [Error sending: Invalid >host specifier: /usr/sbin/sendmail] Ofcourse... pine tried to resolv /usr/sbin/sendmail as a host... You will have to leave smtp-server blank and set sendmail-path instead. As in sendmail-path: /usr/sbin/sendmail -- "A programmer is a person who passes as an exacting expert on the basis of being able to turn out, after innumerable punching, an infinite series of incomprehensive answers calculated with micrometric precisions from vague assumptions based on debatable figures taken from inconclusive documents and carried out on instruments of problematical accuracy by persons of dubious reliability and questionable mentality for the avowed purpose of annoying and confounding a hopelessly defenseless department that was unfortunate enough to ask for the information in the first place." -- IEEE Grid news magazine From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA28886; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA10978; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:55 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA16718; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:12:52 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA189344 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:12:07 -0700 Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA07569 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:12:06 -0700 Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40]) by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA30982 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:12:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:12:05 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE and INTERNAL DATA file In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: gopalan@pearl.cs.sc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Piotr Martyniuk wrote: > Is possible to turn off feature which store messages like this: FAQ. Yes. (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfigure and uncheck the following option: [ ] quell-folder-internal-msg Read the help on it to understand what features will be affected by it. Gopi. -- Gopi Sundaram gopi@cs.sc.edu http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA05933; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA30867; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:15:32 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA19202; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:14:32 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA194302 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:41 -0700 Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA07771 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:41 -0700 Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40]) by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA31007 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:13:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:13:40 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: authentification In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: gopalan@pearl.cs.sc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Gu=E9ny wrote: > My new ISP requires Authentification function to get into the SMTP > server. This function exists on OE and Netscape Messenger. >=20 > Does PC Pine 4.21 for win 95 have this capability ? I think so. Try setting the /user=3D flag on your smtp server definition in (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig smtp-server =3D my.mailserver.example/user=3Dxyzzy See if that works. Gopi. --=20 Gopi Sundaram gopi@cs.sc.edu http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA32336; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA03641; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:06:51 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA21988; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:05:06 -0700 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA59130 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:04:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA103008; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:03:54 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE strange behaviour In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Piotr Martyniuk X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Sounds like you need to enable-incoming-folders in Main, Setup, Config, and then add the folders you want to check for new mail to your Incoming Folders collection. Give that a try and get back to us if you have trouble. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand * Opinions expressed are mine. Everyone else can get their own. :) * * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Piotr Martyniuk wrote: > Hi! > > I have problem with pine, because they have srange behaviour there. Normally > they should skip between new arrived mails if TAB key is pressed and if they > reach last message - they should skip to anoter pine catalogue where is next > new message. This work on linux machine without any special configuration, > just after standard instalation, but this freature don't work on Sun > machines and I don't know what is wrong, because I try this with any > configuration (also with default generated .pinerc file) and pine still do > this same - if reach last mail in pine directory they won't go to another. > > This behaviour is very tired for me, because I have quite a few directores > where I filter my message according to message type (topic, subject, from, > ... etc) and is very hard to find where is stored new arrived message (I > must get in in each pine directory if I want find new message). > > Anybody help me resolve this problem? Please! > > Regards > > Piotr > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA14077; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:38:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA08809; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:38:43 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA53710; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:37:53 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA143794 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:36:21 -0700 Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA25488 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:36:14 -0700 Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [193.74.243.97]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA12939 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:35:49 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:35:48 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Piotr Martyniuk To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Default mail folder location MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: piotr@cactus.sonytel.be X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi! I have problem with change default mail folder location in PINE. I try change this using other pine.config file like this: pine -p pinerc_sony -P pine.conf but this not work. If I check debbug message I got: Debug output of the Pine program (debug=2 debug_imap=0). Version 4.21 Thu Oct 26 11:27:45 2000 reading_pinerc "/home/piotr/.pinecfg/pine.conf" Read 14787 characters: reading_pinerc "/home/piotr/.pinecfg/pinerc_sony" Read 19217 characters: read_pinerc: pinerc_written = 972550757 reading_pinerc "/usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed" Open failed: No such file or directory ======= Current_val options set ======= user-domain : sonycom.com smtp-server : mail.sonytel.be nntp-server : news.sonytel.be inbox-path : /net/primus/mail/spool/piotr folder-collections : mail/[] default-fcc : SENT/SENT default-saved-msg-fo : SAVED/SAVED postponed-folder : POSTPONES mail-directory : mail ^^^^ In "pine.conf" file I set value "mail-directory" like this: # Pine compares this value with the first folder collection directory. # If they match (or no folder collections are defined), and the directory # does not exist, Pine will create and use it. Default: ~/mail mail-directory=/home/piotr/SONY As You see from debbug output PINE don't set this catalog for new mail folder location. How to change default folder location? Regards Piotr -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA00207; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA08440; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:12:21 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA29970; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:10:48 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA212838 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:09:04 -0700 Received: from rwja.umdnj.edu (rwja.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.4.100]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA16664 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:09:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rwja.umdnj.edu (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA18371 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:09:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:09:02 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Gessner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC Pine - Retain login name/password information for session MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am installing PC Pine in a library public lab environment. I have looked through quite a few websites, archives, etc. and I believe that I have answered my own question, but I'd like to post to this list to be certain. I've installed PC Pine with the values for the first two lines of pinerc set as: personal-name="" user-id="" Upon Pine startup, users are prompted for a login name and password. Login and access to their INBOX successfully follows. The first time composing a message, the user is prompted for a Personal Name, in addition to a login name [defaults to previous entry], password, and User ID for From Address [defaults to login name]. My question is, since the user has already entered the login name and password when Pine was started, is there a way to automatically enter and accept these values (login name, password, User ID for From Address) for composing messages, rather than the user having to confirm or re-enter them the first time a message is composed? Thanks, Robert Gessner -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA21348; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA32227; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:38:18 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA14696; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:36:56 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA205416 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:48 -0700 Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA27963 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:48 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA20556; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:47 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA33500; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:18 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA159626 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA06443 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA25504 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9QNAGo28695 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.30 now available MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: PINE-ANNOUNCE-owner@u.washington.edu X-To: Pine Announcement List X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System version 4.30. This latest release introduces some new features and fixes a number of bugs found in earlier releases. More specific information can be found in the built-in release notes ("R" off the Main Menu), and via: http://www.cac.washington.edu/pine/ and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/ Source for the latest Pine release is available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.Z and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.gz and precompiled binaries for the various systems we have direct access to are available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin-compressed The corresponding PC-Pine distribution is available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/pm430w32.zip As with all Pine releases, it is important that you carefully test and determine for yourself that it performs suitably in your environment before placing Pine into production use. The Pine Development Team -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA07843; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA32583; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:48:47 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA36726; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:47:38 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA48054 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:46:44 -0700 Received: from owned.lab6.com (IDENT:root@[212.158.123.230]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA13458 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:46:43 -0700 Received: from localhost (gossi@localhost) by owned.lab6.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA28649; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:46:31 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:46:31 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gossi The Dog To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Steve Hubert wrote: Using pine 4.30 now... Compiled manually on Cobalt Linux 5.0 without problems... Should be interesting to see how it fairs in the next few days before I move it to the production environment :) From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA23088; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA21569; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:09:08 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA23106; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:08:02 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA170830 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:06:36 -0700 Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA17065 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:06:36 -0700 Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51]) by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 12B5310682; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:06:35 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:05:07 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "John Lange" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: RE: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "pine-info" , "Steve Hubert" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Don't know if you want to know about sucessful builds or not, but here it anyhow: Built Pine on Slackware 7.1 ("./build slx"). Built and ran no problem. Yay!! I can use Pine again!!! (until the next exploit :\ ) John Lange -----Original Message----- From: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu]On Behalf Of Steve Hubert Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 6:10 PM To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.30 now available This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System version 4.30. This latest release introduces some new features and fixes a number of bugs found in earlier releases. More specific information can be found in the built-in release notes ("R" off the Main Menu), and via: http://www.cac.washington.edu/pine/ and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/ Source for the latest Pine release is available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.Z and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.gz and precompiled binaries for the various systems we have direct access to are available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin-compressed The corresponding PC-Pine distribution is available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/pm430w32.zip As with all Pine releases, it is important that you carefully test and determine for yourself that it performs suitably in your environment before placing Pine into production use. The Pine Development Team -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA21140; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA15803; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:01:23 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA20698; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:58:38 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA130298 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:50:46 -0700 Received: from zeus.med.uottawa.ca (zeus.med.uottawa.ca [137.122.224.2]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA18062 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:50:46 -0700 Received: from localhost (nbirkett@localhost) by zeus.med.uottawa.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA02923; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This may be a dumb question but..... We hav used pine for years on a SUN UNIX system. I am trying to up-grade to 4.30. I got the SUN binaries from the PIne ftp site. However, when I run the new version on our SUN, it doesn't seem to find the mail files: every account comes up with an empty mail box even though I know there are 40+ messages in the accounts. I have been unable to find any installation information which might explain this problem. CAn someone help me out here? Many thanks. ======================================================================== Nicholas Birkett, M.D., M.Sc. Epidemiology and Community Medicine University of Ottawa nbirkett@zeus.med.uottawa.ca 451 Smyth Rd., (613)-562-5800 x 8289 (voice) Ottawa, Ontario, (613)-562-5465 (fax) Canada. K1H 8M5 ========================================================================= From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA19180; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA21414; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:31:45 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA19264; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:29:45 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA209654 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:28:07 -0700 Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA20046 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:28:07 -0700 Received: from l2124.usc.edu (l2124 [128.125.42.66]) by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA17251 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:27:23 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Robert Larmon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC-Pine 4.30 - love it so far, 2 issues... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: rlarmon@faculty-law.usc.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Okay, so I love the remote config of PC-Pine 4.30. Pretty easy, although my users might freak the first time I show them how to use it. (Note to developers: Who do we make the check out to? j/k) Anyways... I have two minor issues. 1. The remote_pinerc doesn't take into account any form letters that we may have created in PC-Pine. For instance, I have a number of generic forms that I send to people for various tech related issues. It would be really cool if we could have a "remote_forms" file as well, so that I could send form letters, no matter where I am. (This is probably for the suggestion box, but I want to see what other people think first.) 2. I'm getting an error message when I compose a message: "{server-name}/usr/local/lib/imap/global_ad: Can't get write access to mail." Now, I DO know this has something to do with the global_addressbook for imap, but I DON'T know precisely what the issue is, nor how to fix it. I guess I could tinker with the permissions and try to find something on the pine site, but I don't have time to really investigate further until next week and I am hoping someone can help me out. Thanks, RCL ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` ` Robert Larmon ` ` PC Systems Analyst ` ` USC Law School Computing Services ` ` rlarmon@law.usc.edu ` ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA13720; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA10808; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:02:00 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA42456; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:59:20 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA206434 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:53:11 -0700 Received: from mail.nic.mx (mail.nic.mx [200.23.1.17]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA15214 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:52:45 -0700 Received: from mail (mail [200.23.1.17]) by mail.nic.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA17103; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:53:03 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:53:03 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Francisco Arias To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert , pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: farias@mail X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I'm having trouble compiling pine 4.30 on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 8 (both Sparc) with gcc 2.95.1 and 2.95.2, respectively. I get this: $ build gs5 make args are CC=gcc ... snip ... gcc -g -O2 -c mbx.c mbx.c: In function `mbx_hdrpos': mbx.c:1371: internal error--unrecognizable insn: (insn 78 76 80 (set (reg:SI 129) (minus:SI (const_int 4 [0x4]) (const_int -4096 [0xfffff000]))) -1 (nil) (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 4100 [0x1004]) (nil))) *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `mbx.o' Current working directory /usr/local/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso' Current working directory /usr/local/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `OSTYPE' Current working directory /usr/local/src/pine4.30/imap *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso' -------- then it continues but at the end it says: make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../c-client/c-client.a' Links to executables are in bin directory: size: bin/pine: cannot open size: bin/mtest: cannot open size: bin/imapd: cannot open bin/pico: 288693 + 5724 + 4088 = 298505 bin/pilot: 285901 + 5596 + 4088 = 295585 Done Any hints? Has someone have been able to compile it on Solaris 2.x? Thanks, fjac From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA19574; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA24015; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:45:59 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA14364; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:43:00 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA134598 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:40:00 -0700 Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA30817 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:08:05 -0700 Received: from antares.cs.sc.edu (antares.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.103]) by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA71756 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:08:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (gopalan@localhost) by antares.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07035 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:08:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:08:03 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: antares.cs.sc.edu: gopalan owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Francisco Arias wrote: > I'm having trouble compiling pine 4.30 on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris > 8 (both Sparc) with gcc 2.95.1 and 2.95.2, respectively. > Any hints? Has someone have been able to compile it on Solaris > 2.x? Mark Crispin posted a solution in comp.mail.pine yesterday. Here is a link to his message on deja.com http://x72.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=686340733 Gopi. -- Gopi Sundaram gopi@cse.sc.edu http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA21999; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA13391; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:18:23 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA36740; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:16:07 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA91092 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:13:08 -0700 Received: from mail.nic.mx (mail.nic.mx [200.23.1.17]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA09810 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:13:07 -0700 Received: from mail (mail [200.23.1.17]) by mail.nic.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20678; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:13:25 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:13:25 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Francisco Arias To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available #001027@09:52:52.17132 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: pine-bugs@CAC.Washington.EDU, Pine Discussion Forum , X-Sender: farias@mail X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks, the patch does works. fjac On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Mark Crispin wrote: > > When I attempt the compile, I run into this: > > > > gcc -g -O2 -c mbx.c -o mbx.o > > mbx.c: In function `mbx_hdrpos': > > mbx.c:1371: internal error--unrecognizable insn: > > (insn 78 76 80 (set (reg:SI 129) > > (minus:SI (const_int 4 [0x4]) > > (const_int -4096 [0xfffff000]))) -1 (nil) > > (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 4100 [0x1004]) > > (nil))) > > make[3]: *** [mbx.o] Error 1 > > This is a known problem with GCC 2.95 on Solaris. It's a compiler bug. > The problem does not happen with earlier versions of GCC (e.g. 2.8 or > 2.7). > > I just received an email claiming that a successful workaround is to > change line 1336 of mbx.c from > LOCAL->buf = (char *) fs_get ((LOCAL->buflen = HDRBUFLEN) + SLOP); > to > LOCAL->buflen = HDRBUFLEN; > LOCAL->buf = (char *) fs_get (LOCAL->buflen + SLOP); > > I have no way of checking to see if that actually fixes it or not; our > lab's Solaris system seems to have bit the dust. > > In any case, I recommend rolling back to GCC 2.8 simply because this kind > of compiler bug calls into question the overall trustworthiness of that > version of the compiler. > > -- Mark -- > > http://staff.washington.edu/mrc > Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA00015; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA28310; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:03:38 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA35962; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:01:20 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA178074 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:59:44 -0700 Received: from office.x-networks.de (root@badb-3e3635d6.pool.mediaWays.net [62.54.53.214]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA27437 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:59:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (jb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by office.x-networks.de (8.10.0.Beta12/8.10.0.Beta12) with ESMTP id e9RJxcv32125 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:59:39 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:59:34 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joern Bredereck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Filtering on scores MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I have a problem with the scoring/filterin in pine. I tried to setup following: I defined a scoring for all emails addressed to my address "jb@x-networks.de" with a score of 99. After that, I defined a filter for all scores between -INF and 1 (-INF,1) in my inbox to move those emails to the folder "notdirect". All emails with a score of more than 1 should stay in the inbox, and all others, that did'nt match the To:-Header should be moved, but this doesn't work. When I'm sorting for the score I can see, that spam mails, which are not addressed to "jb@x-networks.de" are sorted to the top of the list. So the scoring seems to be working. But the filtering doesn't. I even changed the filter for filtering all matches for the scores -INF,+INF but even this did'nt work. All emails remained in my Inbox and weren't moved to the other folder as supposed to by this filtering-rule. What am I doing wrong? Thanks for your help! Bye, jb -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA11392; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA29003; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:30:06 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA34442; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:29:00 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA387812 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:28:13 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([205.146.146.166]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA05760 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:28:13 -0700 Received: from localhost by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id QAA0000031523; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:28:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:28:08 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.30 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-Authentication-Warning: falcon.dickinson.edu: newcomer owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I just built Pine 4.30 under Digital UNIX 4.0E and 4.0F. For some reason, both versions no longer see my global addressbooks. If I go back to Pine 4.21 they magically reappear so there's nothing wrong with my config files. Anyone else run into this? ================================================================================ Don Newcomer Dickinson College Associate Director, System and Network Services P.O. Box 1773 newcomer@dickinson.edu Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: (717) 245-1699 FAX: (717) 245-1690 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA08983; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA04778; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:01:13 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA24398; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:59:27 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA15988 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:58:04 -0700 Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.PACKETDESIGN.NET [216.15.46.10]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA22269 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:58:04 -0700 Received: from ash.packetdesign.com (ash.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.243]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9S0vjQ52195; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:57:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:58:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Casner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: casner@packetdesign.com X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm very pleased that two of my enhancement requests were included in 4.30, and one of them having been made quite recently. My only nit is that the segmenting of "patterns=" into "patterns-indexcolors=" and "patterns-roles=", etc. in the config file means that running the 4.30 on an old config ignores all the existing roles. Recreating patterns from scratch is a lot of work. I worked around this by using the -pinerc command line option to see what the new variable names were, then sorting my patterns into the appropriate new labels. After that, all seems well so far. -- Steve From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id WAA00853; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA30879; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:50:56 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id WAA07426; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:49:24 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA367468 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:39 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA09778 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:39 -0700 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA06548 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9S5lcB11820 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:38 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The first time you run 4.30 it is supposed to read in the patterns variable and sort them into the appropriate new patterns- vars for you. It should do that if there isn't already a value in one of the new variables, which it uses as a clue that 4.30 has been run before and the patterns have already been copied. Do you think it failed to do the copy? Thanks. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Stephen Casner wrote: > I'm very pleased that two of my enhancement requests were included in > 4.30, and one of them having been made quite recently. > > My only nit is that the segmenting of "patterns=" into > "patterns-indexcolors=" and "patterns-roles=", etc. in the config file > means that running the 4.30 on an old config ignores all the existing > roles. Recreating patterns from scratch is a lot of work. I worked > around this by using the -pinerc command line option to see what the > new variable names were, then sorting my patterns into the appropriate > new labels. After that, all seems well so far. > -- Steve > > > > From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id BAA00230; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA24179; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:18:40 -0700 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id BAA35234; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:17:09 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA83706 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:53:15 -0700 Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.PACKETDESIGN.NET [216.15.46.10]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA04914 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:53:14 -0700 Received: from localhost.cisco.com (main-fw-eth1.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.254]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9T7qbQ61714; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:52:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:14:07 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Casner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: casner@packetdesign.com X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Steve, > The first time you run 4.30 it is supposed to read in the patterns > variable and sort them into the appropriate new patterns- vars for you. It > should do that if there isn't already a value in one of the new variables, > which it uses as a clue that 4.30 has been run before and the patterns > have already been copied. Do you think it failed to do the copy? Thanks. Ah, good, that's what I expected it should do. I think I know why it didn't work for me: I have been using the technique from Nancy's web page to keep the main config in one file invoked with -P and the exceptions in another file invoked with -p. The patterns are in the former, which does not get updated by pine. The new -x feature would have solved that problem if I had learned about that and changed my shortcut before boldly dropping in the new binaries and cranking them up. -- Steve From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:10:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA26754; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:10:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA12479; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:10:27 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA20158; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:09:07 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA156594 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:06:27 -0800 Received: from lcjdap.soroscj.ro (lcjdap.soroscj.ro [193.226.84.253]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA31779 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:06:24 -0800 Received: (qmail 6108 invoked by uid 559); 29 Oct 2000 18:04:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Oct 2000 18:04:32 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 20:04:32 +0200 (EET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Seby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: accents... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I put the patch a compiled pine and how do i write the accents.. with ^\'a doesnt work... Seby... --------------- -=Ionita Sebastian=- http://lcjdap.soroscj/~seby E-mail: seby@lcjdap.soroscj.ro --------------- Schizophrenia beats being alone. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:43:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA09273; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:42:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA15755; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:42:56 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37730; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:41:02 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA164952 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:39:02 -0800 Received: from smtp04.primenet.com (smtp04.primenet.com [206.165.6.134]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA12677 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:39:01 -0800 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp04.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA03886 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:35:48 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr08.primenet.com(206.165.6.208) via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAboaaCh; Sun Oct 29 14:35:38 2000 Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA29850 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:38:48 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:38:47 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: error in Building Pine on BSD2 (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: usr08.primenet.com: ricklew owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I tried building Pine 4.30 on a BSD2.1 system, something I've done successfully with versions 4.10 and 4.21. The build never completes. Instead, the following error is issued: _________________________________________________ takeaddr.o os. o date.c ../pico/libpico.a ../c-client/c-client.a -ltermlib `cat ../c-client/ LDFLAGS` ld: No such file or directory for ../c-client/c-client.a *** Error code 1 Stop. Links to executables are in bin directory: size: bin/pine: No such file or directory size: bin/mtest: No such file or directory size: bin/imapd: No such file or directory text data bss dec hex 258048 12288 7036 277372 43b7c bin/pico 253952 12288 6908 273148 42afc bin/pilot Done _____________________________________________ Thus, pico and pilot are created in the bin directory but not Pine. I'm not a Unix expert by any means, but am gunzipping and using tar to create the Pine package and doing the build. I'm using the pine4.30.tar.gz package from the FTP site. Is there anything I can do to prevent this error? By the way, the precompiled freebsd binary works great on another provider. --Rick Lewis -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:05:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA05548; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:05:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA18033; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:05:56 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA09606; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:04:32 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA304268 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:02:51 -0800 Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA23246 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:02:51 -0800 Received: from computer (user-33qsdep.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.53.217]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA08764 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:02:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <003201c04204$e7215e40$d935aec7@computer> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 18:03:57 -0600 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Raghuram Kalletla" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: problems sending e-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0" X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All! I am having problems configuring Pine to send e-mail. When = I try to compose a message and send it, I get this message: [>Pipe can't access "/usr/lib/sendmail": No such file or directory<]=20 and it makes sense because the path for sendmail on the computer is = "/usr/sbin/sendmail". How do I tell Pine to use the correct path? = Thanks! Raghuram ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello All!
          &nbs= p; =20 I am having problems configuring Pine to send e-mail. When I try to = compose a=20 message and send it, I get this message:
 
[>Pipe can't access = "/usr/lib/sendmail": No such=20 file or directory<]
 
and it makes sense because the path for = sendmail on=20 the computer is "/usr/sbin/sendmail". How do I tell Pine to use the = correct=20 path? Thanks!
 
Raghuram
 
------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:18:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA14794; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:18:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA18316; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:18:56 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA20068; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:17:36 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA219278 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:16:07 -0800 Received: from localhost.edlund.org (m96.ryd.student.liu.se [130.236.214.96]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA23162 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:16:06 -0800 Received: by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id AEA8541052; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:16:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9D141051; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:16:01 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:16:01 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: problems sending e-mail In-Reply-To: <003201c04204$e7215e40$d935aec7@computer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Raghuram Kalletla X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Raghuram Kalletla wrote: > Hello All! > I am having problems configuring Pine to send e-mail. > When I try to compose a message and send it, I get this message: > > [>Pipe can't access "/usr/lib/sendmail": No such file or directory<] > > and it makes sense because the path for sendmail on the computer is > "/usr/sbin/sendmail". How do I tell Pine to use the correct path? > Thanks! In your Pine config set the variable sendmail-path to /usr/sbin/sendmail -- http://www.edlund.org/ "They were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Naturally they became heroes." Leia Organa of Alderaan, Senator From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:56:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA00141; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:56:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA28764; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:56:43 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA29356; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:55:31 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA112942 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:52:52 -0800 Received: from maddler.net (IDENT:root@william.maddler.net [195.120.189.37]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04777 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:52:48 -0800 Received: from localhost (maddler@localhost) by maddler.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA02365 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:58:48 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:58:48 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: William Maddler To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: keys not working in 4.30 linux In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Just installe 4.30 on my linuxbox... but... I'm unable to use ":", ";" and "A"... and maybe some other key... any clue? thx... :) +-----------------------------+ | William::Maddler | Gimme a Beer! +-----------------------------+ bid.it - maddler.net - ecn.org pollodigomma.org Message released under the GNU/GPL license. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:01:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA03792; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:01:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (root@list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA32247; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:01:55 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA18452; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:00:27 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA304220 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:58:22 -0800 Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA30811 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:58:21 -0800 Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40]) by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA01617 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:58:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (gopalan@localhost) by pearl.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA00540 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:58:21 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:58:20 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: keys not working in 4.30 linux In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: pearl.cs.sc.edu: gopalan owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, William Maddler wrote: > but... I'm unable to use ":", ";" and "A"... and maybe some other > key... any clue? [X] enable-aggregate-command-set Make sure that it is checked in (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig Gopi. -- Gopi Sundaram gopi@cse.sc.edu http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/ From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:27:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA25737; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:27:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA30833; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:27:58 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA03784; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:25:55 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA41492 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:52 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18890 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:51 -0800 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA10705 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:51 -0800 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9UJHo206220 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:51 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Don has found a bug. A configuration variable which is a list and which is set _only_ in the fixed configuration file won't work. It will behave as if it isn't set at all. If there is a non-NULL setting in the pine.conf file, or the source code, or the personal config files, then things will work correctly and the fixed setting will override those other settings. A work-around is to also set it in the regular global configuration file, /usr/local/lib/pine.conf. The source code fix is to change line 3342 of .../pine/init.c from if(is_set[0] + is_set[1] + is_set[2] + is_set[3] > 0){ to if(is_set[0] + is_set[1] + is_set[2] + is_set[3] + is_set[4] > 0){ -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Don Newcomer wrote: > I just built Pine 4.30 under Digital UNIX 4.0E and 4.0F. For some reason, > both versions no longer see my global addressbooks. If I go back to Pine > 4.21 they magically reappear so there's nothing wrong with my config > files. Anyone else run into this? From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:00:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA21628; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA11833; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:00:04 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA25710; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:58:42 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA35872 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:56:56 -0800 Received: from hoser.devel.redhat.com (IDENT:root@hoser.devel.redhat.com [207.175.42.139]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA14721 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:56:55 -0800 Received: (from teg@localhost) by hoser.devel.redhat.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id e9UKurI23893; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:56:53 -0500 Message-Id: Date: 30 Oct 2000 15:56:53 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: Steve Hubert's message of "Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:15 -0700 (PDT)" References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Sender: teg@hoser.devel.redhat.com X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: hoser.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to teg@redhat.com using -f X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Steve Hubert writes: > This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System > version 4.30. This latest release introduces some new features and fixes > a number of bugs found in earlier releases. Here is a fix - without it, it segfaults when phoning home (and other places, like sending a mail, if you bypass it). The reason is that functions can pass NULL to it. --- pine4.30/pine/osdep/lstcmpnt.seg Mon Oct 30 15:48:44 2000 +++ pine4.30/pine/osdep/lstcmpnt Mon Oct 30 15:50:31 2000 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ + /*---------------------------------------------------------------------- Return pointer to last component of pathname. @@ -9,8 +10,10 @@ last_cmpnt(filename) char *filename; { - register char *p = NULL, *q = filename; - + char *p = NULL, *q = filename; + + if(filename == 0) + return 0; while(q = strchr(q, '/')) if(*++q) p = q; -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:18:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA03743; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:18:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01915; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:18:01 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA22748; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:16:08 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA166688 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:05 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA14079 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:05 -0800 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA00603; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9ULF3K11682; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:03 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Did you compile with DEBUG turned off? If so, this is really a symptom of another bug. Here is a patch. It will be fixed in the next version of pine. You can work-around the problem by leaving DEBUG defined. In .../pine/pine.c, move line 332, which looks like init_pinerc(pine_state); Move that line up above line 319, which looks like #ifdef DEBUG -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On 30 Oct 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > Here is a fix - without it, it segfaults when phoning home (and other > places, like sending a mail, if you bypass it). The reason is that > functions can pass NULL to it. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:32:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA08559; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:32:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA15116; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:32:26 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA26324; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:30:57 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA98894 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:29:22 -0800 Received: from hoser.devel.redhat.com (IDENT:root@hoser.devel.redhat.com [207.175.42.139]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA03764 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:29:21 -0800 Received: (from teg@localhost) by hoser.devel.redhat.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id e9UMTIY24629; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:29:18 -0500 Message-Id: Date: 30 Oct 2000 17:29:18 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: Steve Hubert's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:02 -0800 (PST)" References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Sender: teg@hoser.devel.redhat.com X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: hoser.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to teg@redhat.com using -f X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Steve Hubert writes: > Did you compile with DEBUG turned off? Yes. > If so, this is really a symptom of another bug. Thanks - I'll apply your patch (checking for NULL is a nice addon anyway, though :) -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:48:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA04764; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:48:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA15617; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:48:06 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA27092; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:45:59 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA20196 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:04 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA03581 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:03 -0800 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA18467 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9UMi2215919 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:03 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Yes it is. We'll put that in. Thanks. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On 30 Oct 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > Thanks - I'll apply your patch (checking for NULL is a nice addon > anyway, though :) From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:02:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id XAA21760; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:02:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (root@list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA16890; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:02:39 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id XAA24372; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:01:10 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA166666 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:59:47 -0800 Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.PACKETDESIGN.NET [216.15.46.10]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA28494 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:59:47 -0800 Received: from localhost.cisco.com (main-fw-eth1.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.254]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9V6xZQ79906; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:59:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:21:45 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Casner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Remembered save destination MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: casner@packetdesign.com X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The new feature to remember the destination from one save operation to the next is very handy. It would be even handier if it was remembered across pine invocations! -- Steve -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:35:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id XAA13504; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:35:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (root@list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA17390; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:35:06 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id XAA17280; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:33:59 -0800 Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu (leibrand@bp15.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.205]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA115982 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:33:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost) by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA116454; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:32:50 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:32:50 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Scott Leibrand To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: accents... In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Seby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Seby wrote: > I put the patch a compiled pine and how do i write the accents.. > > with ^\'a doesnt work... If you need assitance getting a patch to work, you'll need to tell us which one it is and where you got it. -- Scott Leibrand leibrand+pine@u.washington.edu (Yes, that is a valid address.) http://students.washington.edu/leibrand * Opinions expressed are mine. Everyone else can get their own. :) * * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. * * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. * From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA17681; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA04169; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:06 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA28270; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:26:30 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA216094 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:24:45 -0800 Received: from wugate.wustl.edu (wugate.wustl.edu [128.252.120.1]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA20067 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:24:45 -0800 Received: from library.wustl.edu (library.wustl.edu [128.252.66.1]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.10.0.Beta12/8.10.0.Beta12) with ESMTP id e9VFOgG00785 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:24:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (jerryp@localhost) by library.wustl.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA02647 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:24:43 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:24:43 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jerry Pelikan To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Compiline pine with ldap support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: jerryp@library.wustl.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there a way to compile pine to work with the Netscape iPlanet Directory Server? It doesn't have the liblber.a or the libldap libraries. Jerry Pelikan Jerry-Pelikan@library.wustl.edu -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:10:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA29656; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA07506; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:10:23 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA26242; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:08:40 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA361078 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:53 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA22470 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:53 -0800 Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA30942 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:53 -0800 Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost) by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9VH6qs21860 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:52 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:51 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Compiline pine with ldap support In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The binaries have LDAP client code included. If you are compiling pine from source you will have to supply an LDAP library. OpenLDAP is the most likely choice. Once you have a pine (or other client) with LDAP client support, it should work with any LDAP Directory server. Did I understand the question? -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Jerry Pelikan wrote: > Is there a way to compile pine to work with the Netscape iPlanet Directory > Server? It doesn't have the liblber.a or the libldap libraries. > > Jerry Pelikan Jerry-Pelikan@library.wustl.edu From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:29:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA30532; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (root@list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA10127; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:29:31 -0800 Received: from host (server@lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA26328; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:27:59 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA204078 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:20:09 -0800 Received: from alpha.circinus.com (nemo@alpha.circinus.com [63.114.74.91]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA12330 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:19:28 -0800 Received: from localhost (nemo@localhost) by alpha.circinus.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20622 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:19:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:19:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nemo To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: error compiling pine.. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I'm having problems compiling it... command is ./build gs5 for Solaris 8 and gcc especially this error: make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../c-client/c-client.a' gcc -g -O2 -c unix.c gcc -g -O2 -c mbox.c gcc -g -O2 -c mbx.c mbx.c: In function `mbx_hdrpos': mbx.c:1371: internal error--unrecognizable insn: (insn 78 76 80 (set (reg:SI 129) (minus:SI (const_int 4 [0x4]) (const_int -4096 [0xfffff000]))) -1 (nil) (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 4100 [0x1004]) (nil))) *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `mbx.o' Current working directory /export/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso' Current working directory /export/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `OSTYPE' Current working directory /export/src/pine4.30/imap *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso' Making Pico and Pilot make CC=gcc -f makefile.gso Making Pine. make CC=gcc LDAPLIBS=../ldap/libraries/libldap.a ../ldap/libraries/liblber.a LDAPCFLAGS=-DENABLE_LDAP -I../ldap/include -f makefile.gs5 make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../c-client/c-client.a' Links to executables are in bin directory: size: bin/pine: cannot open size: bin/mtest: cannot open size: bin/imapd: cannot open bin/pico: 288685 + 5724 + 4088 = 298497 bin/pilot: 285901 + 5596 + 4088 = 295585 Done -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ -----------------------------------------------------------------